My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit A
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 1:06:43 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 1:06:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2023-06 <br />Page Four <br /> <br /> <br />and parking areas are constructed on properly prepared surfaces. The proposed development <br />would provide adequate drainage to prevent flooding. Parking lot and roof drainage would <br />drain into landscaped bioretention areas that would filter contaminants before entering the <br />arroyos and, ultimately, the bay. The Property is not located within an Alquist-Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zone. The flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management <br />Agency (FEMA) indicate the Property is not located in a flood hazard zone. Therefore, it is <br />recommended the City Council make this finding. <br /> <br />5. Whether streets and buildings have been designed and located to complement the <br />natural terrain and landscape: <br /> The Property is in a developed area of the City and would not involve the extension of any new <br />public streets. Development would be located on level areas of the Property. The proposed <br />structure would be compatible in size and scale with surrounding structures. New landscaping <br />including large box-sized trees would be installed to mitigate the loss of the existing <br />landscaping and trees. Therefore, it is recommended the City Council make this finding. <br /> <br />6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into the design of <br />the plan: <br />The public improvements associated with the Project would be consistent with City design <br />standards. The existing driveway entrances are located and configured to provide adequate <br />line-of-sight viewing distance and to facilitate efficient ingress/egress to and from the Property. <br />All on-site drive aisles would meet City standards for emergency vehicle access and <br />turn-around. Adequate access would be provided to all structures for police, fire, and other <br />emergency vehicles. The building would be required to meet the requirements of the Uniform <br />Building Code, Fire Code, other applicable City codes, and State of California energy and <br />accessibility requirements. The building would be equipped with automatic fire suppression <br />systems (sprinklers). Therefore, it is recommended the City Council make this finding. <br /> <br />7. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: <br />The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district , and with <br />the 2012 Housing Site Development Standards and Guidelines with which conformance <br />pursuant to the PUD is required. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to ensure the <br />desires of the Applicant and the community are understood and approved prior to <br />commencement of construction. The proposed project implements the purposes of the PUD <br />Ordinance in this case by providing a residential project that is well-designed and <br />well-integrated with the existing development in the vicinity, that fulfills the desires of the <br />applicant, and that meets the City’s General Plan and Housing Element goals and policies. By <br />taking advantage of the flexibility of the PUD district while substantially conforming to the <br />Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines, the applicant and staff have <br />been able to work together to design the Project in a manner most appropriate for this use. <br />Moreover, input from the adjacent property owners and tenants has been sought through a <br />Planning Commission work session; further opportunity for public comment will occur at the <br />Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Through the PUD process the Project has <br />provided the Applicant and the City with a development plan that optimizes the use of this infill <br />site in a sensitive manner. Therefore, it is recommended the City Council make this finding. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.