My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2023 2:21:49 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 4:26:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3_Exhibit A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
3_Exhibit B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
3_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
3_Exhibit D
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
3_Exhibit E
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
3_Exhibit F
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUD-136, Mall Residential Project Planning Commission <br />29 of 34 <br />Architecture and Design <br />The building has significant detailing and articulation, and the form/shape of the building is <br />visually interesting. The materials and colors are attractive and will blend in well with the <br />surrounding developments based on similar finish schemes found on other existing <br />development in the vicinity. The height of the building (approximately 65 feet tall to the top of <br />the parapet) would be less than or commensurate with other existing buildings in the vicinity. <br /> <br />Table 5 lists the height and number of stories of the building and compares it with other <br />similarly sized buildings in the vicinity. <br /> <br />Overall, staff supports the architectural design, massing and detailing of the building. <br /> <br />Table 5: Height Comparison of Project and Surrounding Development <br />Location Stories Height <br />Proposed Building 5 ½- <br />stories <br />65 ft. at the parapet/roof screen <br />10x Genomics Building 1 <br />1701 Springdale Avenue <br />3-stories 53 ft. at the parapet and 65 ft. at the top <br />of the equipment screen <br />10x Genomics Future Proposed Buildings 2/3 <br />1701 Springdale Avenue <br />6-stories 67 ft. at the parapet and 82 ft. at the top <br />of the equipment screen <br />Workday office building <br />6110 Stoneridge Mall Road <br />6-stories 87 ft. 6 in. at the parapet and 105 ft. at <br />the top of the equipment screen <br />Stoneridge Corporate Plaza’s <br />6140 Stoneridge Mall Road <br />5-stories 65 ft. at the parapet and 80 ft. 5 in. at the <br />top of the equipment screen <br />Pleasanton Corporate Commons <br />6200-6230 Stoneridge Mall Road <br />5-stories 70 ft. 3 in. at the parapet and 81 ft. 10 in. <br />at the top of the equipment screen <br />Safeway <br />5928 Stoneridge Mall Road <br />5-stories 76 ft. at the parapet and 85 ft. 10 in. at <br />the top of the equipment screen <br />BART parking garage <br />6002 Stoneridge Mall Road <br />4-stories, <br />5-levels <br />59 ft. 4 in. at the top of the elevator <br />penthouse <br />Sheraton Hotel <br />5990 Stoneridge Mall Road <br />6-stories 60 ft. 1 in. <br /> <br />Scenic Highway Plan for Interstate 680 <br />In 1985 the City adopted the Scenic Highway Plan for Interstate 680 in the City of Pleasanton <br />which contains policies for new residential and commercial development on parcels <br />immediately adjacent to the I-680 corridor. The project was analyzed for conformance to the <br />applicable policies and found to be consistent with the plan . For example, the building would <br />be located at least approximately 100 ft. from the I-680 CalTrans right-of-way (approximately <br />1,200 ft. is proposed), the building would not conflict with views from the highway due to <br />existing screening provided by the adjacent office buildings, residential uses and landscaping <br />would remain, and new perimeter landscaping associated with the proposed project. <br /> <br />Signage <br />Wall-mounted signage has been shown conceptually on the east side of the building, but no <br />sign details have been provided at this time. Staff finds the general location and size of the <br />sign to be acceptable. Staff anticipates additional wall-mounted signage, ground-mounted <br />project identification and directional monument signs would also be proposed . A condition has <br />been included that requires the applicant to submit a comprehensive sign program for the <br />project which will be subject to the review and approval by the Director of Community <br />Development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.