Laserfiche WebLink
• At about 11 minutes 49 seconds of the December 15th mtg., I heard that the "Mall 2.0" needs to be, "a <br /> place to go in Pleasanton." In my opinion, if there's an abundance of traffic congestion and a <br /> frustrating wait time through the signal lights, people might visit once or twice but will seek different <br /> destination experiences. Placing the amount of housing which matches the traffic report's <br /> recommendations probably will assure the Mall 2.0's success as a "place to go in Pleasanton." <br /> • At 3 hours 36 minutes, a council member's comment was, "If we weren't being constrained by traffic <br /> concerns", the reality is that we are. <br /> • At 3 hours 45 minutes, a different council member's comment was that the considerations will have <br /> "no impact on the current residents". Disagree. As the area becomes more congested, people will use <br /> Springdale and Foothill Rd. Traffic will have a significant impact on the future residents, current <br /> residents, as well as anyone traveling through and around the Stoneridge area. <br /> Thanks for your attention, and I hope I am not too naive to think that our council will represent our <br /> neighborhood too in deciding that the 1,440 housing units including the density bonus is thoughtful, <br /> responsible, intelligent growth which is in the best interest for this area and thus for the rest of Pleasanton. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Pattie Hall <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 2 <br />