My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibit C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
01-11
>
5_Exhibit C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2023 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
1/6/2023 3:38:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\01-11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•Site Circulation: Pedestrian walkways. The proposed amendments prohibit routing <br />pedestrian walkways thought parking areas, parking drive aisles, and alleys, and require <br />separation from such areas with use of a fence, low wall, or landscaping. <br />•Site Circulation: Connection to adjacent streets and neighborhoods. The proposed <br />amendments require at least 75 percent of the internal streets and paseos to provide <br />connection to adjacent streets and neighboring development and be publicly accessible. <br />•Building Orientation: Building frontage and mid-block access. The draft amendments <br />establish a maximum percentage of building frontage compared to site dimension, <br />based on size of the project site. For example, for sites ranging from 0.5 acres to 3 <br />acres, where each site dimension is less than 400 feet, up to 70 percent of the site <br />dimension along public streets, paseos, and open spaces are allowed to be lined with <br />building frontage. Additionally, mid-block access, in the form of a pedestrian walkway, <br />driveway, internal street, or alley is required such that each building frontage along a <br />site dimension is not more than 35 percent of that site dimension. Similar standards <br />(but with different proportions) are required for sites ranging in three to seven acres and <br />sites larger than 7 acres. Diagrams to illustrate these requirements are in the draft <br />document. <br />•Building Orientation: Building and unit entrances. The proposed objective standards <br />require at least 75 percent of the total number of building and unit entrances to face <br />public streets, internal streets, paseos, or open space areas. <br />•Building Orientation: Building comers. The proposed text requires building corners to <br />have either residential, live/work (where permitted), or mixed-use commercial uses; the <br />standards prohibit garages, parking entries, and utility rooms on building corners. <br />•Public Streets: Front setbacks on public street frontages. The proposed standards <br />require a 10-foot minimum front setback measured from the back of sidewalk for <br />ground-floor residential uses and indicate 15 feet is preferred to allow a second row of <br />trees. If the project has a retail or other commercial component, a setback of at least 10 <br />feet is required, also as measured from the back of sidewalk. <br />•Public Streets: Street trees. The standards modify language related to street trees and <br />require an average spacing of 25 feet with no individual spacing exceeding 40 feet. <br />•Internal Streets: Through or loop circulation. The objective standards require that a <br />maximum of 20 percent of the total number of internal streets and alley segments are <br />allowed to terminate in a dead-end or turn-around. <br />•Internal Streets: Building and porch setbacks. As proposed, the standards require <br />buildings to be setback 8 feet from the back of sidewalk; residential porches and <br />terraces are permitted to encroach up to 4 feet into the 8-foot setback. <br />•Internal Streets: Parking. The objective standards indicate that diagonal parking is <br />prohibited and that parallel parking is required for at least 50 percent of the length of the <br />internal street, either on one or both sides of the street. <br />P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br />8 of 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.