My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibit C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
01-11
>
5_Exhibit C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2023 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
1/6/2023 3:38:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\01-11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
40-45 du/ac and over 45 du/ac, respectively. Minimum dimensions and size (square <br />footage) for the group usable open space is proposed to be established in Part 3 and is <br />discussed in this report below. <br />•Private open space. The Housing DG as adopted in 2012 did not require private open <br />space but if it was provided, it was allowed to be deducted from the group usable open <br />space requirement (each square foot of private open space was allowed to be <br />considered equivalent to two square feet of group usable open space). This <br />requirement, in the view of staff and VMWP, is overly generous and has had the effect <br />of diminishing the amount of group open space that has been provided in recent <br />projects. The proposed amendments would reduce the proportion of private open space <br />that is allowed to be counted towards group open space to 30 percent (i.e., only the first <br />30 percent of the square footage provided as private open space would be allowed to <br />be deduced from the group open space requirement), thereby increasing the required <br />group usable open space area of a project. Staff believes projects will continue to <br />provide private open space (as a desirable amenity for residents when renting or selling <br />units), but in a manner that will improve the amount of shared space. <br />•Residential and bicycle storage. Language to require secured storage space and <br />indicate that bicycle storage may be combined with this storage space has been added <br />to this section. <br />•Housing Sites (Table 2.1). The proposed amendments add a column to notate which <br />sites were developed and not developed as of 2021 to Table 2.1. <br />•Allowed uses. The allowed and conditionally allowed uses for mixed-use sites are <br />largely unchanged, with the exception of select clarifications to align with terminology in <br />the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC). <br />Part 3 (Development Standards and Design Guidelines) <br />This section of the document includes the greatest number of modifications and is divided into <br />two sections: site design and planning, and architectural features. An existing compendium of <br />different building types currently included in this section would be moved from this section to <br />the appendices. Therefore, this part of the document is focused on development standards; <br />where standards are not possible or practical, design guidelines are provided. Key changes <br />are summarized below (please refer to Exhibit A for a comprehensive comparison of changes <br />to the 2012 Housing DG). <br />Site Design and Planning <br />This section focuses on the following topic areas: site circulation, building orientation, public <br />streets, internal streets, alleys, paseos, vehicular parking, bicycle parking, open space, <br />landscaping, site lighting, and utility/service areas. <br />•Site Circulation: Alley/parking areas and building entries. Where the 2012 Housing DG <br />"encourage" primary building entries to be oriented to public streets, internal streets, <br />and paseos/open spaces, the proposed amendments limit the number of individual <br />entries in each building that are allowed to front alleys and parking areas to 25 percent <br />P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission 7 of 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.