Laserfiche WebLink
for these sites should be limited to a conformance analysis of proposed projects with the <br />Objective Design Standards. This adjusted process would involve approval by the <br />Planning Commission and the City will base its review, and related approval or denial of <br />a project, on the applicable objective standards that have been adopted. All Planning <br />Commission approvals are reported to the City Council which has authority to call <br />decisions up for review if needed. <br />The draft program language that was added is: <br />Program 4.8 The City will develop an additional Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) process that serves strictly as a conformance review. This PUD <br />conformance review will evaluate PUD zoned housing sites against objective <br />standards and will not require City Council approval. <br />Modifications to Residential Multi -Family (RM) Zoning Standards <br />In both HCD's formal letter to staff, as well as in the two calls with staff, HCD provided <br />feedback and questions related to land use controls (e.g., height, parking standards, <br />setbacks). Specifically, HCD questioned if existing land use controls impact projects' <br />ability to achieve maximum densities without receiving any exceptions (e.g., variances, <br />Conditional Use Permits, or PUDs). Typically, single-family and commercial projects can <br />build without requiring exceptions and can submit Design Review applications <br />complying with existing zoning districts. However, historically, typically multi -family <br />residential projects, particularly on smaller infill sites, pursue PUDs (though some have <br />developed within existing zoning, without a PUD or any exceptions). Some of the <br />potential constraints to accommodating the allowed densities within RM zones include <br />the required setbacks, as well as required on-site parking, although it is noted and <br />acknowledged that the City has emphasized residential projects being fully parked on <br />site to avoid "overflow" impacts on to neighboring streets, especially within the <br />downtown. It is further noted that the PMC allows for some flexibility in parking <br />standards within downtown sites, specifically to reduce constraints to development on <br />these sites. <br />Given HCD's line of questioning surrounding the land use controls, and based on <br />experience with similar comments in other jurisdictions, to satisfy HCD's concern <br />and achieve a certified Housing Element, the City's professional services team <br />(Lisa Wise Consulting) recommends including a program to review and update the <br />Residential Multi -Family zoning standards, to create more standards that allow for <br />assigned densities to be feasibly achieved, without the need to pursue a PUD, <br />variance, or other exceptions. Although the exact standards in need of adjustment <br />will be determined through study, they are likely to include setbacks, floor area <br />ratio, and possibly modified parking minimums within RM zones that would scale <br />parking requirements to unit size. Staff intends to work with the professional <br />services team (Van Meter Williams Pollack) working on the Objective Design <br />Standards to identify and bring forward any needed revisions to specific standards, <br />in accordance with the Housing Element program. <br />Page 5 of 21 <br />