My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
122022
>
21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 12:47:34 PM
Creation date
12/16/2022 11:20:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/20/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
21 ATTACHMENT 1-3
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
21 ATTACHMENT 4
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
21 ATTACHMENT 5-6
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
21 ATTACHMENT 7
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City's current PUD process, as defined in the PMC, is discretionary (i.e., the City <br />has significant latitude to approve or deny projects and to set site-specific development <br />standards, development densities, etc.). The process requires both Planning <br />Commission review and City Council approval. Through the PUD process, subject sites <br />modify their respective zoning to a special PUD zone that allows for greater flexibility of <br />standards tailored to the site's specific constraints and opportunities. Developers <br />frequently opt to use the PUD process in conjunction with applications involving <br />rezoning of a site, and/or to accommodate larger scale projects that need flexibility from <br />the City's typical zoning standards. In turn, the City negotiates certain project amenities <br />and typically the resulting projects include a high-quality design, are compatible within <br />their context, and achieve the developer's goals. <br />Although the PUD process is beneficial in allowing developers flexibility, particularly for <br />larger -scale developments, and has allowed the City to negotiate a wide range of <br />community benefits in projects, the process has sometimes been criticized as lacking <br />clarity, introducing uncertainty in the entitlement process, and adding processing time <br />and costs to project approvals. PUDs on average are approved three to four months <br />after the project is deemed complete, though the entire process through completeness <br />may take closer to a year or longer for complex projects to complete. <br />The Housing Accountability Act (HAA) requires the City to facilitate housing <br />development through a streamlined process that provides certainty in outcomes. <br />Pursuant to the HAA, local jurisdictions may only rely on objective standards when <br />making a determination to approve, deny or modify a project's density below the <br />maximum allowed by the General Plan or zoning. <br />Given HCD's concerns surrounding the PUD process and based on experience with <br />similar comments in other jurisdictions, to satisfy HCD's concern and achieve a certified <br />Housing Element, the City's professional services team (Lisa Wise Consulting) <br />recommends including a program to modify the PUD process for the rezoned housing <br />sites, as outlined below. <br />First, consistent with the Housing Accountability Act, the City is developing a <br />comprehensive set of Objective Design Standards for residential and mixed-use <br />developments, including both the existing and new Housing Element sites, as well as <br />residential and mixed-use zones, that allow multi -family development. These standards <br />will help streamline development approvals, provide clear, consistent, and objective <br />guidance to applicants, and ensure quality and consistency throughout residential <br />projects, including infill projects within and adjacent to existing residential <br />neighborhoods. This is outlined in Program 6.1. <br />Second, staff recommends adjusting the PUD process to create two paths. One path <br />would be as it exists today, and would be applicable to projects seeking rezoning, <br />and/or wishing (or needing to) deviate from established objective design standards. <br />Another path — PUD conformance review — would be established for rezoned sites <br />identified for housing in the 6th Cycle Housing Element. Staff suggests the PUD process <br />Page 4 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.