My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
122022
>
21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 12:47:34 PM
Creation date
12/16/2022 11:20:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/20/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
21 ATTACHMENT 1-3
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
21 ATTACHMENT 4
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
21 ATTACHMENT 5-6
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
21 ATTACHMENT 7
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The DER identifies significant and unavoidable impacts in both Transportation and <br />Utilities and Service Systems. In terms of Utilities and Service Systems, the significant <br />and unavoidable impact relates to projected water supply, due to the recently identified <br />PFAS concerns that have caused City wells to be taken offline, as the City has yet to <br />determine the most appropriate way to secure replacement water supply. It is important <br />to note that this is a conservative conclusion, and the City is confident that the current <br />supply issues will ultimately be able to be addressed, whether through working with <br />Zone 7, conservation approaches, or other strategies under review. New development <br />also provides the opportunity to integrate more efficient fixtures, water efficient <br />landscaping and other strategies required by the most recently adopted building codes, <br />thereby lessening overall new water demand. <br />The water supply is not site specific, as the RHNA unit requirement does not change <br />regardless of which sites are included (i.e., the impact is driven by the number of units <br />the City is required to zone for, to meet the RHNA). <br />However, regarding Transportation, the significant and unavoidable impact relates to <br />VMTs. Many of the potential sites for rezoning are located in areas which are expected <br />to generate a home-based VMT per resident above the relevant threshold of <br />significance. While almost all sites are above the level of significance (for both project - <br />level and cumulative), some sites have relatively better VMT per capita than others. For <br />example, Area 2 (Stoneridge Mall) and several of the sites in Hacienda have VMT per <br />capita only marginally above the threshold, whereas others are much more significantly <br />above the threshold. <br />Since this impact would be significant and unavoidable, sites which have relatively lower <br />VMTs are considered to be more favorable. Site by site projected VMT impacts are <br />noted below in Table 1. <br />Page 11 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.