My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
121522
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2023 4:10:07 PM
Creation date
12/9/2022 2:52:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
01 ATTACHMENT 1
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\121522
01 SUPPLEMENTAL
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\121522
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
among the parcels, potential uses that may complement future housing, and an <br /> illustrative circulation and open space concept to support the scenarios. The City hosted <br /> a community meeting on December 8 to solicit feedback on the conceptual scenarios as <br /> mentioned previously in this report; the outcome of this community meeting will be <br /> summarized in a supplemental memo and reported at this joint Planning Commission <br /> and City Council meeting. <br /> Property Owner Input <br /> The project team has met with property owners as a group and in numerous one-on-one <br /> meetings to understand and discuss priorities, concerns, and goals since start of the <br /> Framework project. Property owners have: <br /> • Expressed support for a mixed-use concept but also have reservation about the <br /> process, timing, costs, and constraints <br /> • Acknowledged that collaboration among the owners is a complicated undertaking <br /> due to agreements and varied partnerships, and that cooperation between <br /> owners should be incentivized for a "greater good benefit" <br /> • Indicated a strong desire to maintain as much flexibility as possible due to a <br /> shifting market and future opportunities <br /> • Agreed that the mall has more vehicular parking than is realistically needed <br /> • Communicated that the distribution of uses and housing at the mall to be <br /> equitable, meaning that each owner benefits in an equal way from changes to <br /> allowed land uses and allocation of housing units <br /> • Asked that the City participate in infrastructure and other public improvements <br /> instead of relying on private development to absorb all costs <br /> • Cautioned against developing an overly prescriptive plan or "locking in" details of <br /> the Framework, particularly at this early stage, understanding that market forces, <br /> development costs and other factors continue to need to be analyzed in more <br /> detail <br /> • Expressed concern that any redevelopment should support the ongoing vitality of <br /> the existing shops and the mall "core" and maintain visibility and access. <br /> Although supportive of proceeding with the Framework, it is important to note that there <br /> is not a consensus or preferred development scenario that has been collectively <br /> endorsed by the various mall property owners at this time. <br /> CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS <br /> Conceptual development scenarios have been developed and are intended to guide <br /> discussion about the allocation of housing units, potential new non-residential uses, <br /> circulation, and activity spaces around the mall. <br /> Elements Common to Scenarios <br /> There are a number of elements common to each of the conceptual scenarios, <br /> including: <br /> Page 6 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.