Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Housing Element December 14, 2022 <br />19 of 21 <br /> <br />the City. The provisions of Housing Element law for sites subject to annexation <br />will require the City and Alameda County to negotiate the transfer of a portion of <br />Alameda County’s RHNA to the City, to account for incorporation of those <br />parcels into the City of Pleasanton. This negotiation would occur following a <br />future annexation – and while it is likely that the number of RHNA units <br />transferred will in all likelihood be less than the unit counts noted in the sites <br />analysis (since development in the County could not occur at a similar density <br />without annexation and connection to City utilities), the above -moderate <br />inventory should be sized to accommodate such a potential transfer. As <br />proposed, there is a slight buffer to above moderate to account for this transfer. <br />It is noted that, due to the need to annex the properties (a legislative action by <br />the City), the City would retain a higher degree of discretion over the ultimate <br />review and approval of housing projects on these sites, compared to others in the <br />inventory. <br /> <br />Table 4, below, has been adjusted to reflect staff’s recommendation. As recommended, <br />there is a slight buffer (approximately four-percent) of the total assumed capacity above <br />RHNA and a larger buffer (approximately 28-percent) of the total max capacity above <br />RHNA (surplus of 1,643 units). <br /> <br />Table 4- [Appendix B, Table B-11, Residential Development Potential and RHNA- <br />Adjusted] <br /> <br />Extremely <br />Low <br />Very <br />Low Low Moderate Above <br />Moderate Total <br />RHNA See Very <br />Low 1,750 1,008 894 2,313 5,965 <br />ADUs See Very <br />Low 5 28 46 14 93 <br />Approved/Entitled <br />Projects - - 23 - 393 416 <br />Remaining RHNA See Very <br />Low 1,745 957 848 1,906 5,456 <br />Site Inventory See Very <br />Low/Low 1,090 552 641 2,283 <br />Surplus / (Shortfall) See Very <br />Low/Low (1,612) (296) (1,265) (3,173) <br />Rezone Sites (Net <br />New) <br />See Very <br />Low/Low 1,696 325 1,402 3,422 <br />Surplus With Rezone <br />Sites <br />(Assumed Capacity) <br />See Very <br />Low/Low 83 29 129 241 <br /> <br />Staff seeks the Planning Commission’s review and feedback on the recommended <br />rezone sites. <br /> <br />