19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Exhibit A Scope of Work alternatives (e.g., whether they are more technical or institutional in nature), evaluation criteria (e.g., whether they are quantitative or qualitative),and available data. 4.3. Partner Coordination. BC will orchestrate up to two meetings with agency partners to review the alternatives,solicit input, and explore possible arrangements/agreements within existing or new infrastructure. 4.4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC).A BC subject matter expert will review the analysis results(Task 4.2) prior to presenting findings to the City. Task 4 Assumptions • Costs will be estimated to an order-of-magnitude level, using available information, and should be considered for comparative purposes only.The cost of purchased water will be estimated based on past agreements and other references; however,this study does not include negotiation of costs with Zone 7 or another water supplier. The cost of PFAS treatment and well rehabilitation will be based on the City's PFAS Treatment and Well Rehabilitation Project Basis of Design Report and not independently verified by BC. • BC will hold up to two workshops with City staff to discuss and develop evaluation criteria and review draft analysis results. Workshops will be up to two hours in duration and attended by up to three BC staff. BC will prepare workshop agendas and materials and document key outcomes. • Agency partner meetings will be up to 90 minutes in duration and attended by up to two BC staff. City staff will coordinate scheduling with agency partners. 5. Recommendations 5.1. Project Delivery Options. BC will present potential project delivery models for design, construction, operation and maintenance,financing, and ownership of the preferred alternative from Task 4 and make a recommendation considering the City's objectives, legal and financial limitations, and preferences as confirmed by City staff. BC will orchestrate a workshop(up to 90 minutes)with City staff to review project delivery models and confirm options to be recommended and presented to City Council (in Task 6). 5.2. Draft Report. BC will prepare a draft report summarizing the work performed in Tasks 2 through 4 and presenting the results of the alternatives evaluation. The report will include a draft implementation plan for the preferred alternative that includes the recommended project delivery model, major tasks, and milestone schedule.The draft report will be submitted to City staff for review and feedback. BC will orchestrate one review meeting(up to 90 minutes)to discuss City comments. 5.3. Final Report.The final report will be based on comments provided by City staff from the review of the draft report. BC will submit final report to the City in Word and PDF format. 5.4. QA/QC. BC will review the draft and final report for quality control prior to submitting to the City. Task 5 Assumptions • City staff will confirm objectives and preferences(e.g.,for levels of control and risk)for BC to consider in evaluating project delivery options. • Draft report will be provided in Microsoft Word format. City staff will provide one consolidated set of comments (in Microsoft Word and/or an Excel comment log)within two weeks of submittal. 6. Council Meetings and Engagement 6.1.Water Subcommittee Meetings.Attend monthly water subcommittee meetings via Zoom and coordinate with City staff to prepare for meetings, including preparation of slides. 4