19 ATTACHMENT 3 - Laserfiche WebLink

STE E LWAVE infrastructure systems in the plan area.2 EPSP infrastructure subject to fair share cost sharing between Steelwave and Kiewit would include things like roadways, potable and recycled water systems, sanitary sewer facilities, parks, and schools.3 Because the City is moving forward with planning for the Kiewit Property through the Update, the Update must address EPSP infrastructure planning and cost-sharing. The Update should be revised to ensure the Kiewit Property and other properties in the EPSP area will be held responsible for their fair share of EPSP infrastructure costs, regardless of whether development is permitted through the EPSP process or through a separate planning effort. We recommend accomplishing this by revising Update Goal 1, Program 1.7(2)to more explicitly address infrastructure cost-sharing in the EPSP Area, (proposed revisions in underline): 2. Kiewit Property: Either in conjunction with preparation of a Specific Plan for East Pleasanton ("EPSP"),or within a more focused Master Plan or PUD plan for the 50-acre Kiewit area, work with the property owner to develop and adopt or approve a conceptual plan, including housing at mixed densities, and a significant affordable housing component.The planning will take into account infrastructure and infrastructure cost-sharing among EPSP developers, circulation, open space and amenities for residents, with the goal of creating a sustainable new neighborhood in Pleasanton. The plan will encourage a diversity of housing types and seek to include innovative missing-middle type housing that can provide more compact units and market-rate homeownership and/or rental housing that is relatively affordable compared to larger units. EPSP Infrastructure planning completed as part of this process will include other property owners in the EPSP area and will culminate with completion of a detailed infrastructure financing and phasing program designed to ensure fair share allocation of infrastructure costs among EPSP property owners. (Update, p. 26.) We remain committed to working with the City to develop a fair and comprehensive EPSP, and we ask the City to proactively address potential EPSP infrastructure and cost-sharing complications posed by inclusion of the Kiewit Property in the Update. Please revise the Update as proposed above to these ensure issues are addressed contemporaneously with any planning work completed for the Kiewit Property. 2 Id. at p. 109. Id. at p. 108(listing shared infrastructure improvements). 2 070253\15 65186v3