My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
071922
>
19 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 2:48:22 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 2:47:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
19
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\071922
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STEELWAVE <br /> VIA EMAIL <br /> June 20, 2021 <br /> Planning Commission <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> 200 Old Bernal Avenue <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> RE: Comments on the City of Pleasanton's Sixth Cycle Housing Element Update Public Review <br /> Draft <br /> Honorable Commissioners, <br /> We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the City of Pleasanton's Sixth Cycle <br /> Housing Element Update ("Update") Public Review Draft. As you know, we unsuccessfully <br /> petitioned for approximately 123 acres of land we own within the East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br /> ("EPSP") Area to be included in the Update's Sites Inventory. The City's decision to include in <br /> the Update the Kiewit Property— another property within the EPSP Area—threatens to upend <br /> the City's long-stated intention to complete comprehensive planning for development in the <br /> EPSP Area. To avoid serious EPSP complications,we request the City to comprehensively <br /> address EPSP infrastructure planning and cost sharing as part of any planning completed for the <br /> Kiewit Property. The Update should be revised to ensure this is accomplished. <br /> As we have explained in prior letters to the Commission, for decades we have worked <br /> with the City in good faith to complete the EPSP.As part of that process, the City indicated <br /> public infrastructure costs would be allocated on a "fair share" basis between Steelwave <br /> (formerly Legacy/Lionstone) and Kiewit—the primary landowners within the EPSP area.The City <br /> also indicated that a detailed infrastructure financing and phasing program would be prepared <br /> prior to approval of any development within the EPSP Area.1 An EPSP developer's fair share was <br /> to be determined based upon its project's percentage of the total demand for various <br /> 1 See Preliminary Draft Ease Pleasanton Specific Plan Revision 1, p. 107 (November 2014) ("Costs for <br /> Specific Plan shared infrastructure improvements(those that benefit the owners of developable <br /> property) are to be funded by Plan Area landowners, identified as "Funding Developers."The Funding <br /> Developers include: Legacy/Lionstone and the Kiewit Infrastructure Company(See Figure 2.4). Funding <br /> obligations are to run with the land and not with the owner of the property. Prior to approval of any <br /> Planned Unit Development(PUD) plan, a detailed infrastructure financing and phasing program is to be <br /> prepared potentially as part of an EPSP Development Agreement, subject to adoption by the City <br /> Council.This agreement will specify the various financing commitments, resources, mechanisms and <br /> timing to be utilized.") <br /> 1 <br /> 070253\15165186v3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.