My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
071922
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 3:03:29 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 2:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
09 SUPPLEMENTAL
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\071922
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
determined that two of the bids contained irregularities causing them to be deemed non- <br /> responsive. The OC Jones bid did meet the requirements of the ACTC Local Business <br /> Contract Equity (LBCE) Program. The bid documents clearly state if a bid does meet <br /> the ACTC LBCE Program requirements it shall be deemed non-responsive and <br /> disqualified. The DeSilva Gates bid contained mathematical errors that according to <br /> California Contract Code would allow the bid to be withdrawn without forfeiture of the <br /> bid required ten percent guarantee bond. California case law indicates that if a bidder <br /> can withdraw their bid due to mathematical errors without forfeiture of the bid guarantee <br /> bond, their bid must be considered non-responsive and disqualified. Therefore, the <br /> lowest responsive and responsible bidder to the bid solicitation is Ghillotti Construction, <br /> which met the ACTC LBCE goals and is capable by both experience and financial <br /> position to accomplish the work. Attachment 4 shows all four bids received. <br /> As mentioned previously the construction bid is only one component of the total cost <br /> estimated to implement the JDEDZ Project traffic mitigation measures. The Final Cost <br /> Estimate (Attachment 2) includes the Ghillotti Construction bid of$20,707,537, and all <br /> other costs, including design, right-of-way acquisition and a 10 percent construction <br /> contingency, to bring the total estimated project to $33,581,261. Since the Final Cost <br /> Estimate includes a contingency equal to 10 percent of the low construction bid, it <br /> should be considered a conservative cost estimate. It represents the expected upper <br /> limit of the total project cost. Barring something far beyond the ordinary for public works <br /> construction projects, the final Cost Certification (required by Section 3.10 of the 2018 <br /> Agreement at the completion of construction) should not exceed the Final Cost <br /> Estimate. <br /> Finally, Costco has hired Cumming Group to track all expenditures related to the project <br /> to comply with Section 3.10 of the 2018 Agreement. Cumming Group has provided city <br /> staff expenditure reports regularly, nine reports in total through April 2022. As of April <br /> 28, 2022, Costco has invested $3,248,202 toward the design and construction of the <br /> JDEDZ Project traffic mitigation measures. <br /> 2018 Agreement Reimbursement Terms Based on the Planning Level Estimate <br /> The 2018 Agreement requires Costco to pay all upfront costs associated with the design <br /> and construction of the JDEDZ Project traffic mitigation measures and requires the City <br /> to pay all upfront costs to acquire the right-of-way necessary to construct the traffic <br /> mitigation measures. As previously noted, the 2018 Agreement is based on a Planning <br /> Level Estimate prepared in 2017 to construct the JDEDZ Project traffic mitigation <br /> measures which consist of the Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 Project and the JDEDZ <br /> Street Improvements. <br /> The Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 Project design and construction were estimated to cost <br /> a total of$7.11 million. The 2018 Agreement specifies the City will reimburse Costco <br /> $6.4 million in four payments during construction (Section 4.1) and will reimburse <br /> Costco the remaining $710,000 from the JDEDZ Transportation Fee and 40 percent of <br /> city sales tax revenue generated by the proposed Costco store (Section 4.2 and 4.3). <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.