My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2021-18
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC-2021-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2022 11:28:46 AM
Creation date
4/25/2022 11:28:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2021-18
NOTES
PUD-138, MARTIN INDERBITZEN, AVS RANCH LLC, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
NOTES 2
VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, 25-LOT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, APN NO. 949-16-6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that no storm runoff will flow across the subdivision boundary. (PROJECT <br /> SPECIFIC CONDITION) <br /> 47. MUNICIPAL REGIONAL PERMIT (C.3): Referring to the Vesting Tentative Map <br /> together with the Bay Area Hydraulic Model (BAHM) report, the following design <br /> parameters shall be checked by the applicant (Address this condition prior to <br /> improvement plan approval): <br /> a. The note at the bottom of the table on Sheet TM 5.0 states, "The <br /> calculations are based on the Alameda Countywide Clean Water <br /> Program C.3 Technical Guidance...", yet a report was submitted using <br /> BAHM. The note should therefore read, "The calculations are based on <br /> the Bay Area Hydraulic Model (BAHM). When comparing the numbers in <br /> the table to the BAHM calculation, the following discrepancies were <br /> noted: <br /> i. The input parameters in the BAHM calculations for DMA 2 (page 5) <br /> indicate an impervious total of 6.238 acres whereas the summation of <br /> areas from the table suggest a total of 6.45 acres (81,700 SF + <br /> 104,400 SF + 95,000 SF = 281,100 SF = 6.45 acres). <br /> ii. Based on the impervious area total, the BAHM calculations (page 12) <br /> indicate a needed area for DMA 2 of 25,000 SF (200' X 125' = 25,000 <br /> SF). In contrast, the table shows a provided area of 24,850 SF. <br /> b. Because the storm drain design proposes the use of two parallel pipe <br /> networks, one for storm runoff requiring treatment, and one for storm <br /> runoff from open space areas that does not require treatment that <br /> converge at BMP 2, BMP 2 will function both as a treatment feature and <br /> detention basin during large storm events. The BAHM calculations (page <br /> 12) indicate that water will rise to a depth of 2.5' or 30" before discharging <br /> into the overflow outlet. The landscaping within the basin must therefore <br /> be designed to survive when inundated. <br /> In addition, water in the basin that rises above 18" is considered a <br /> drowning risk for children. The California Building Code requires said <br /> basins to be enclosed with a self-closing, self-latching fence with release <br /> mechanisms placed at least 54 inches from the ground surface. The <br /> fence must be at least 60"-high and have a maximum vertical clearance <br /> of 2" from the ground to the bottom of the fence. There must be no gaps, <br /> voids or other features that may allow a child under 5 years old to climb <br /> over. (PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITION) <br /> 48. EXISTING WINDMILL: A windmill well pump exists within the eastern portion of <br /> Parcel A. If the well will no longer be used, it shall be abandoned according to <br /> Alameda County General Ordinance No. 0-2015-20 as administered by Zone 7 <br /> Water Agency. If instead it will be utilized for irrigation water, the applicant shall <br /> assure that the well pump is sufficient to service the flow and pressure demands <br /> PUD-138 and VTM 8616 Planning Commission <br /> Page 13 of 30 <br />g permit <br /> issuance. Such fees include, but are not limited to, the pro-rata share of <br /> PUD-138 and VTM 8616 Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 30 <br />nt. No objections or comments have <br /> been received at the time this report was prepared. <br />ect property is not located in a <br /> flood hazard zone. As such, the Commission recommends that the City Council <br /> conclude that this finding can be made. <br />censed civil engineer, <br /> which include but is not limited to the type, location, and sizing calculations of the <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 16 of 25 <br />d) individuals. <br /> PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission <br /> Page 3 of 25 <br />