_Minutes_January 24, 2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Member Piekarski asked if there were plans to ease bike crossing. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the improvements offered additional protection. He discussed right of ways and use for future bike paths. Member Maciel asked how two lanes were added. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the right away from the west side was utilized. Member Maciel restated the concrete island was unnecessary. 6. West Las Positas Corridor Plan Update Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson provided an update on the West Las Positas Corridor. Stephen Dunbar suggested the sidewalk near Denny's be used as a bikeway. He discussed difficulties with wide sidewalks and provided ideas for the conceptual design. Member Piekarski stated she was confused, disappointed, frustrated and angry with the proposed plan. She expressed concern about safety with riding bicycles opposite of traffic. She asked if there were still protected bike lanes on the street. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the intent was shared use paths, with directional travel on each side. He discussed the desire of avid bikers to ride away from pedestrians. Member Piekarski stated protected bike lanes on the street were needed. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson explained the proposed conceptual plan to allow bike lanes. Member Piekarski expressed concern about the cost of the project and suggested protected bike lanes and a shared path. In response to Member Negro, Associated Traffic Engineer Nelson stated bike and pedestrian improvements would occur in conjunction with reconstruction of the roadway and the planned construction was 2023-2024. Member Negro recommended moving on and considering some of the lower priority items. Member Nelson expressed disappointment that the protected intersections were removed. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the protected intersections would remain. Member Nelson stated the shared use plans were confusing and suggested signage or paint. He questioned the means of accessing the shared use path and suggested a physical barrier from street parking to protect the bike lane. He encouraged the best plan to get kids to school safely. Member Houston asked about the Iron Horse Trail. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the project would include up to the Iron Horse Trail. Member Houston suggested elevated paths where it crossed over the road and concurred with Member Negro regarding completion of projects. Member Maciel stated he preferred the proposed option better than the previous option. He suggested adding space to the bike lane. He expressed concern regarding pick up and drop off in front of the school and floating parking stalls creating more blind spots. Bicycle, Pedestrian & Trails Committee Minutes January 24, 2022 Page 3 of 5