_Minutes_January 24, 2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

He suggested parking at the curb with the bike lane pushed towards the street. He stated he preferred the mixed-use path. Member Piekarski stated the idea was to reduce driving to the school and create a safe means to bicycle to school. Member Houston suggested the school area be the most protected. Member Henry stated there should be physically protected bike lanes. Member Stewart questioned why the project ended before Owens. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson explained that it was part of Phase 2. Member Stewart stated the more dangerous area should be completed first to encourage children to ride to school. Traffic Engineer Nelson explained the funding restrictions. Member Piekarski and Member Houston concurred with Member Stewart. Member Piekarski asked about funding opportunities. Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the Council would be considering additional grant funding in the near future and discussed limited opportunities for Pleasanton due to limited disadvantaged areas. COMMUNICATIONS None. COMMITTEE REPORTS 7. Updates from the Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Fields provided a summary of her background and involvement in the City. She provided an overview of the Parks and Recreation Commission activities including approval of the all-inclusive park and new skate board park at Mercer Sports Park, and cricket pitch and pickle ball at Muirwood Park. 8. Updates from Project/Program/Agency Representatives None. 9. Other brief reports on any meetings, conferences, and/or seminars attended by the Committee members COMMITTEE COMMENTS Member Piekarski mentioned upcoming CalBike educational sessions including the Summit in Oakland, April 6-9, 2022, and California Advocacy Success Stories on February 22, 2022. Bicycle, Pedestrian & Trails Committee Minutes January 24, 2022 Page 4 of 5 Member Nelson stated the shared use plans were confusing and suggested signage or paint. He questioned the means of accessing the shared use path and suggested a physical barrier from street parking to protect the bike lane. He encouraged the best plan to get kids to school safely. Member Houston asked about the Iron Horse Trail. Associate Traffic Engineer Nelson stated the project would include up to the Iron Horse Trail. Member Houston suggested elevated paths where it crossed over the road and concurred with Member Negro regarding completion of projects. Member Maciel stated he preferred the proposed option better than the previous option. He suggested adding space to the bike lane. He expressed concern regarding pick up and drop off in front of the school and floating parking stalls creating more blind spots. Bicycle, Pedestrian & Trails Committee Minutes January 24, 2022 Page 3 of 5