Laserfiche WebLink
In response to Councilmember Arkin, Ms. Campbell confirmed staffs recommendation is to require <br /> solar and battery-powered lighting immediately, and perhaps down the road tapping in from the City's <br /> lighting could be an option if a CIP deemed it feasible. She noted the distance from a parklet to street <br /> lights would factor into this assessment. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Ms. Campbell confirmed staff's estimate is March or April would <br /> be feasible for having an approved parklet design available and having the application process ready. <br /> Councilmember Arkin commented that this timeline leads to March 1, 2022, as a good deadline to have <br /> current installations removed. She advised the City Council received a letter from the Pleasanton <br /> Downtown Association (PDA) where this target date seems reasonable. She commended the staff <br /> report and added they need to be mindful of safety issues around impeded visibility of stop signs and <br /> crosswalks. She expressed support for the preapproved design concept for aesthetics. <br /> Councilmember Arkin agreed with having the annual fee waived for the first year to get businesses up <br /> and running. She also agreed with the $1,000 per parking space fee for the second year but added her <br /> desire to see a reevaluation after this point to assess what the costs are to the City, including an <br /> inflationary factor. <br /> Councilmember Arkin opposed the ability to build into an adjoining parking space beyond a business's <br /> frontage even with the neighboring businesses' approval. She noted this could be complicated in the <br /> future if either the neighboring business owner changes or if they are having difficulties in searching for <br /> a new tenant because of the unavailability of the parking space. She advised it could be particularly <br /> troublesome if a new dining establishment went into the commercial space and had another restaurant <br /> in their potential parklet space. She advised having a uniform parklet program downtown would be <br /> great and commended the proposal. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Interim City Manager Dolan clarified staff is looking for a formal vote, or at <br /> least a consensus, on whatever changes the City Council wishes to make to the proposal. He <br /> requested they dig into potential changes to assess if it is one Councilmember speaking or if their <br /> opinion speaks for the group. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Ms. Campbell advised staff could have a draft design by the <br /> end of January for an internal review which would be finalized in February and, hopefully, has the <br /> program ready to roll in March or April. She noted March 1, 2022, would be a challenge. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Ms. Campbell confirmed confirmed if the City Council decides to <br /> approve the program tonight, staff would have the guidelines and could start assessing the existing <br /> parklets. Interim City Manager Dolan advised the Operations Services Department has asked for a 6-8- <br /> week gap for tree pruning and street cleaning. Ms. Campbell explained it is more realistic to push back <br /> the temporary pop-up deadline than to move up the parklet program's rollout date. <br /> Councilmember Balch advised uniform designs are good but they should allow the uniqueness of the <br /> various merchants such as different colored umbrellas. He requested a list of design standards for <br /> existing parklets to move forward and permanent parklets be completed sooner through design review. <br /> Councilmember Balch reported he would stretch the width standard to eight feet because the length is <br /> being shrunk for the three-foot curb stopgaps so it would be a good compromise. He advised he would <br /> allow staff to evaluate the question of the parklets being solid wood or metal, especially if there is a <br /> design review process. He commended staffs answer to his inquiry about the reason for not having <br /> external advertisements. He agreed with solar or battery-powered lights but opposes having uniform <br /> umbrellas. He supported a future City Council review of the program's success as a whole rather than <br /> allowing the parklets in virtual perpetuity. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 18 December 21, 2021 <br />