Laserfiche WebLink
pop-ups. He noted this is probably not the best long-term solution and expressed support for a more <br /> permanent solution like the one proposed. <br /> Councilmember Testa requested not holding to January 7, 2022, deadline but rather waiting until the <br /> City's program is fully put together for a smoother transition. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Interim City Manager Dolan advised one reason for holding to <br /> the deadline is the City would like a window to clean up the area as there has been significant feedback <br /> about the shabby appearance of some of the pop-ups. He noted City Council chose the date and the <br /> majority can change the date. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Ms. Campbell advised most of the pop-ups do not meet the <br /> proposed standards and are prohibiting necessary cleaning by the City. She reported it has been <br /> almost two years without power washing and cleaning and the City does not know the condition of the <br /> street under the pop-ups. <br /> Interim City Manager Dolan advised one item he left off his previous list of considerations is the existing <br /> pop-ups in their current form are not popular with the retailers. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Ms. Campbell advised there is a fee for outdoor dining but it has been <br /> waived for the temporary pop-ups. She reported if the City moved to a more permanent parklet the <br /> DSRSD Sewer Impact Fee would come into play. She advised staff has been working with DSRSD and <br /> they indicated they would be willing to waive the fee for the first 2-3 years. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Ms. Campbell advised parking lot pop-ups would be removed at the same <br /> time as the street pop-ups. Director Clark confirmed temporary pop-ups in private parking lots would be <br /> removed. She advised the City already has policies and programs allowing someone to apply for a <br /> permanent dining area in a private parking lot. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Ms. Campbell advised this proposal is not considering parklets for bicycle <br /> parking. This proposal is focused on dining expansion and the program is written for dining and not <br /> retail. She advised staff has not heard interest in parklets from the retailers. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Ms. Campbell explained staff's understanding is 100 pounds of weight <br /> support per square foot is a sufficient requirement and industry standard. She advised the parklet <br /> designs would be made so the substructure can handle the weight. The cost of a parklet could be wide- <br /> ranging depending on the chosen materials and amenities. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Interim City Manager Dolan reported the surface area for a parking space <br /> without land cost is about $25,000 and it is even more in a structure. He advised the proposed $1,000 <br /> per space fee is not even close to the cost of the space. He noted staff is not convinced there will be <br /> more than the current 20 parklets and there may even be less once the cost of having a permanent <br /> parklet is considered. He explained this means only a fraction of the 176 eligible parking spaces will be <br /> taken by parklets. He advised the In-Lieu Parking Fee does not cover what it costs the City but is <br /> substantial at $25,000 per parking space. <br /> Mayor Brown opened the public hearing. <br /> Maurice Dissels stated it sounds like there is still work to be done to complete a parklet program and <br /> requested canceling the January 7, 2022, deadline. He is encouraged that the report discussed <br /> potential variance allowances for existing parklets. He advised the City could extend the parklet <br /> program in increments until businesses can have firm requirements to meet for their parklets. <br /> Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 12 of 18 December 21, 2021 <br />