My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
030122
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2022 9:37:26 AM
Creation date
2/24/2022 9:34:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tree Report, 218 Ray Street, Pleasanton Ed Brennan, Consulting Arborist <br />February 12, 2020 Page 4 <br />Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural <br />condition and ability to safely coexist within a development environment (see Tree Survey for <br />suitability ratings for individual trees). <br />Table 4: Tree Suitability for Preservation <br />Good These are trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br />potential for longevity at the site. Four trees were rated as good in <br />suitability for preservation, two Bradford pears (trees #2 & 3), the valley <br />oak (tree #6), and the pecan (tree #7). <br />Moderate Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may <br />be abated with treatment. Trees in this category require more intense <br />management and monitoring, and may have shorter life -spans than <br />those in the "gond" category. Three trees were rated as moderate in <br />suitability for preservation, all Bradford pears (trees #1, 4 & 5). <br />Poor Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in <br />structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be <br />expected to decline regardless of management. The species or <br />individual tree may possess either characteristics that are undesirable in <br />landscape settings or be unsuited for use areas. No trees were included <br />in this category. <br />Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations for Preservation <br />Appropriate tree retention develops a practical match between the location and intensity of <br />construction activities and the quality and health of trees. The Tree Survey was the <br />reference point for tree condition and quality. Potential impacts from construction were <br />evaluated using the Topographic Survey, Sheet 1, provided by Alexander and Associates. <br />The Topographic Survey also shows the placement of the proposed building at the rear of the <br />lot. <br />My evaluation of the plan indicates that six of the seven surveyed trees could be preserved <br />on the site. The only tree requiring removal to implement the proposed building is tree #5, a <br />10' diameter Bradford pear. Preservation of the other six trees is predicated on the Tree <br />Preservation Guidelines that follow. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.