Laserfiche WebLink
Tree Report, 218 Ray Street, Pleasanton <br />February 12, 2020 <br />Ed Brennan, Consulting Arborist <br />Page 3 <br />Suitability for Preservation <br />Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to consider <br />the quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees to function well over <br />an extended length of time. Trees that are preserved on development sites must be carefully <br />selected to make sure that they may survive development impacts, adapt to a new <br />environment and perform well in the landscape. <br />My goal is to identify trees that have the potential for long-term health, structural stability and <br />longevity. For trees growing in open fields, away from areas where people and property are <br />present, structural defects and/or poor health presents a low risk of damage or injury if they <br />fail. However, we must be concerned about safety in use areas. Therefore, where <br />development encroaches into existing plantings, we must consider their structural stability as <br />well as their potential to grow and thrive in a new environment. Where development will not <br />occur, the normal life cycles of decline, structural failure and death should be allowed to <br />continue. <br />Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors: <br />■ Tree health <br />Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, <br />demolition of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil <br />compaction than are non -vigorous trees. <br />• Structural integrity <br />Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that cannot <br />be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas where <br />damage to people or property is likely. <br />■ Species response <br />There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction impacts <br />and changes in the environment. In our experience, for example, Calif. black walnut <br />is sensitive to construction impacts, while coast is tolerant of site disturbance. <br />IN Tree age and longevity <br />Old trees, while having significant emotional and aesthetic appeal, have limited <br />physiological capacity to adjust to an altered environment. Young trees are better <br />able to generate new tissue and respond to change. The potential longevity of the <br />Monterey pines is low because of the mature age and infection with pitch canker. <br />Table 3: Tree Dripline Measurements <br />Tree No. <br />Species <br />Trunk diameter <br />Dripline Measurements (feet) <br />(inches) North <br />South <br />East <br />West <br />1 <br />Bradford pear <br />11 8' <br />6' <br />8' <br />8' <br />2 <br />Bradford pear <br />7 7' <br />5' <br />7' <br />8' <br />3 <br />Bradford pear <br />6 4' <br />5' <br />6' <br />4' <br />4 <br />Bradford pear <br />9 9' <br />8' <br />9' <br />8' <br />5 <br />Bradford pear <br />10 12' <br />11' <br />11' <br />9' <br />6 <br />Valley oak <br />6 4' <br />5' <br />0' <br />5' <br />7 <br />Pecan <br />25 27' <br />21' <br />25' <br />24' <br />Suitability for Preservation <br />Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to consider <br />the quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees to function well over <br />an extended length of time. Trees that are preserved on development sites must be carefully <br />selected to make sure that they may survive development impacts, adapt to a new <br />environment and perform well in the landscape. <br />My goal is to identify trees that have the potential for long-term health, structural stability and <br />longevity. For trees growing in open fields, away from areas where people and property are <br />present, structural defects and/or poor health presents a low risk of damage or injury if they <br />fail. However, we must be concerned about safety in use areas. Therefore, where <br />development encroaches into existing plantings, we must consider their structural stability as <br />well as their potential to grow and thrive in a new environment. Where development will not <br />occur, the normal life cycles of decline, structural failure and death should be allowed to <br />continue. <br />Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors: <br />■ Tree health <br />Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, <br />demolition of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil <br />compaction than are non -vigorous trees. <br />• Structural integrity <br />Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that cannot <br />be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas where <br />damage to people or property is likely. <br />■ Species response <br />There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction impacts <br />and changes in the environment. In our experience, for example, Calif. black walnut <br />is sensitive to construction impacts, while coast is tolerant of site disturbance. <br />IN Tree age and longevity <br />Old trees, while having significant emotional and aesthetic appeal, have limited <br />physiological capacity to adjust to an altered environment. Young trees are better <br />able to generate new tissue and respond to change. The potential longevity of the <br />Monterey pines is low because of the mature age and infection with pitch canker. <br />