My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
030122
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2022 9:37:26 AM
Creation date
2/24/2022 9:34:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Downtown Specific Plan: Per the DSP, since ground -floor residential is proposed, the <br />project must be fully parked on-site. The DSP does not indicate the type of parking that <br />may be used to comply with the policy; thus, the Commission has some discretion <br />regarding compliance with the policy. <br />The DSP does not specify how parking should be provided nor if alternative solutions (such as <br />a parking lift) can be used to meet the DSP policy. However, the policy calls for the project to <br />be fully parked on-site. The lift offers a creative solution to meet parking requirements and staff <br />concludes the project will be fully parked on-site. While this is not a parking solution proposed <br />in the City to date, many cities across the Bay Area have allowed for parking lifts as a way to <br />accommodate residential parking on constrained sites. Staff believes the "vertical tandem" <br />parking lift solution will be successful, particularly because it will be dedicated to and used by <br />the residential unit and should be supported as meeting the intent of the DSP policy. <br />That said, the upper space of the lift is not unobstructed from the street (i.e., the lower car <br />needs to be removed for clear access), meaning the upper space does not comply with the <br />PMC (i.e., the site will provide 11 spaces per the Code instead of 12). The PMC allows an <br />applicant in the Downtown Revitalization District who is unable to provide all the required <br />off-street parking required by Code, to apply for an in -lieu parking agreement. The agreement <br />would require the applicant to pay in -lieu parking fees for the number of spaces the project is <br />deficient in parking. As such, staff recommends an in -lieu agreement and fee payment for one <br />parking space. The current in -lieu parking fee for surface parking is $20,594. The in -lieu <br />agreement would need to be approved by the City Council and entered into by the applicant <br />prior to issuance of building permits. Staff supports an in -lieu agreement for this project, <br />particularly given that the project would comply with the DSP's parking requirement. <br />Building Desi nand Massing <br />The proposed building has a Craftsman architectural style with horizonal lap siding (fiber <br />cement), cantilevered second floors, natural stone, composite roof shingles, and incorporates <br />horizontal wood fencing and a CMU block wall at the carport. The building includes a <br />second -story balcony and rooftop deck, as seen in Exhibit B. <br />The Downtown Design Guidelines and Downtown Specific Plan policies apply to the subject <br />property. Of note, the guidelines speak to ensuring architectural compatibility of new <br />construction through character and style of surrounding structures. The Commission raised <br />concerns about the architectural style of the proposed building during the workshop — at that <br />time it was a contemporary styled building, inconsistent with the Craftsman architectural style <br />of the existing commercial structure at the front of the site. Since the workshop, the applicant <br />has modified the proposed design including materials, roof forms, and architectural detailing. <br />Staff finds the new design is now more compatible and consistent with the existing commercial <br />building on-site. <br />See Figure 3 below for a side-by-side comparison of the existing commercial building on the <br />site and the proposed residential building. <br />P20-1053, 218 Ray Street <br />7of11 <br />Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.