My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
030122
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2022 8:55:19 AM
Creation date
2/24/2022 8:55:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> The Open Space Committee consists of one member appointed by the Board of <br /> Supervisors, one member appointed by the Livermore City Council, one member <br /> appointed by the Pleasanton City Council, and one member appointed by the Sierra <br /> Club. The City of Pleasanton representative is Councilmember Valerie Arkin. As part of <br /> the settlement of litigation over the expansion of the Altamont Landfill, the parties to the <br /> litigation agreement (Alameda County. Waste Management of Alameda County, the <br /> Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton, and various environmental groups) agreed that the <br /> County would impose a fee totaling $0.75 per ton at the Altamont Landfill and Resource <br /> Recovery Facility for open space acquisition. Eighty percent of the Open Space Fee is <br /> designated for open space expenditures in the eastern portion of the East County and <br /> 20 percent is for expenditures in the western portion of East County. <br /> In accordance with Subsection 7.4.2 of the Altamont Landfill Settlement Agreement, the <br /> Committee is tasked with preparing a priority list of properties for acquisition in fee or <br /> permanent easement for the eastern and western areas. The Committee's <br /> recommended priority list must be submitted to and accepted by the associated <br /> governing bodies by March 1st of every year. <br /> In 2017, the Committee developed a list of general priority areas over the course of <br /> several meetings. Each committee member provided their jurisdiction's conservation <br /> priorities. In addition, open space organizations, including the Tri-Valley Conservancy, <br /> Alameda Creek Alliance, Save Mount Diablo, California Rangeland Trust, and East Bay <br /> Regional Park District, presented the priority areas that had been identified by each <br /> organization. <br /> In 2018, the Committee voted to refer the list of priority areas to the associated <br /> governing bodies for acceptance in addition to requesting authorization of expenditures <br /> to hire UC Berkeley to identify, rank and map high conservation values for the purpose <br /> of further refining the list at a future date. On June 19, 2018, Pleasanton City Council <br /> approved a resolution adopting the list of general priority areas and authorization of <br /> funds for the purpose of further refining the list when UC Berkley completes its <br /> research. This resolution is included as Attachment 2. <br /> While the list has not returned to the governing bodies on an annual basis, the <br /> Committee recognizes the Settlement Agreement requires an annual review and <br /> acceptance. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The Open Space Committee's 2018 general priority areas of properties for acquisition <br /> includes the following locations: <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.