|
2. Approval of the applications with modifications. The Planning Commission could
<br /> approve the CUP and Variance/Parking Variance for the private school, but with a
<br /> modified number of students, hours of operation, or with other changes to the proposal.
<br /> Staff believes the proposed private school will not adversely impact the adjacent uses and the
<br /> findings to approve the project could be made as proposed and conditioned. Therefore, staff
<br /> recommends neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued.
<br /> PUBLIC NOTICE
<br /> Notices of these applications were sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a
<br /> 1,000-foot radius of the site prior to the January 26, 2022, Planning Commission meeting (item
<br /> was continued). Public comments received by staff for that meeting are attached as Exhibit C.
<br /> These comments were generally against the proposed private school use with most neighbors
<br /> concerned about impacts of the use on the local public parking supply based on sensitivity to
<br /> the existing church use on the same site and its perceived impacts on the neighborhood.
<br /> Notices of these applications were again sent to surrounding property owners and tenants
<br /> within a 1,000-foot radius of the site for this meeting date. Staff has provided the location and
<br /> noticing map as Exhibit D for reference. At the time this report was published, no additional
<br /> public comment was received by staff.
<br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
<br /> This project is categorically exempt (Section 15301, Class 1 , Existing Facilities) from the
<br /> requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no environmental
<br /> document accompanies this report.
<br /> CONCLUSION
<br /> As proposed and conditioned, staff believes the proposed private school would not adversely
<br /> impact the surrounding uses. Conditions of approval have been included which will ensure the
<br /> safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. Staff
<br /> has reviewed the proposed narrative and plans and believes parking has been adequately
<br /> addressed to accommodate this use. Staff believes the proposed use will fulfill a community
<br /> need and the proposed location is appropriate for this use.
<br /> Primary Author
<br /> Eric Luchini, Senior Planner, 925-931-5612 or eluchini(a�cityofpleasantonca.gov
<br /> Reviewed/Approved By:
<br /> Melinda Denis. Planning and Permit Center Manager
<br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development
<br /> P21-0715/P22-0126, Lighthouse Baptist School Planning Commission
<br /> 13 of 13
<br />rounding uses and would not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses
<br /> or properties and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project. However,
<br /> alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include:
<br /> 1. Denial of the applications. Such an action would preclude the applicant from
<br /> establishing a private school in the proposed location; or
<br /> P21-0715/P22-0126, Lighthouse Baptist School Planning Commission
<br /> 12 of 13
<br />ods and some proportion of students can reasonably
<br /> be expected to carpool, bike or take transit, reducing the peak pick-up/drop-off parking
<br /> requirement to less than one vehicle per student.
<br /> P21-0715/P22-0126, Lighthouse Baptist School Planning Commission
<br /> 11 of 13
<br />ghthouse Baptist School Planning Commission
<br /> 10 of 13
<br />ies. Therefore, staff believes the subject site presents special
<br /> circumstances and the first finding can be made.
<br /> P21-0715/P22-0126, Lighthouse Baptist School Planning Commission
<br /> 9 of 13
<br />ll applicable City permits for the
<br /> ;r�?� eoperation.,
<br /> �a •,��_ •�;;;.! �.3:S.t^ prior to the commencement of o;�Ft!'u
<br /> •
<br /> r '.ti . ii "I' 6. tic alcohol shell be consumed outside e the establishment.
<br /> .
<br /> ;- - nee,',. 7. Outdoor trash dumping shall not occur between the hours of
<br /> " f�,:,; the Planning
<br /> .tj:.:' . 10:00 ' a.m. , unless '.'t is ld b;:
<br /> r, p.m. rind v:JO
<br /> ' • ' ., r- that the sound levels from dum¢�..ng trash are less
<br /> �'' .,��,..3�.�,. IJirectc .
<br /> .'N. Yf ,e. than 60 dBW..
<br /> 11,
<br /> 41
<br /> yyIiir.4-41
<br /> l.'{ur - ,rt. -•s ,, P}. >;;AV tt„` 9 ,..,.:y�,42A"!; 5 F'J't C A7 1y_J +"� A 7, x.V. •,A.:4,..1-4.5r,-; Ri+ `04.:.. S! +P.,�'`Jf ,:,:t, ,:t .i , +4. 1v , i vt "..1, rdy� S a ..u..'; , f+ v,• i e,,),,,,-.ik• . 1 •�S ,ilu�''y�f.��,t e.
<br /> ,<. j Jr,[`(r'j r .r : . . '.<:+t;C P ;••*• r Y ''fl��'t�:y ' p, ','',4t SQA' iM`r,. *t. n �.' 7 'w...
<br /> ..,.�, ,� .i'. ... ('. i,D,. gjjth ' „ , ...sr a '`4 ..::�••.
<br /> '•P 1 '�.+;,`.++ ii,± ref'•}�K•xi.�fl�t •A)�'{'. •Vit.-.C v".� :4 ' �'x'�A°y f'...rl .,. `L.� . `l ''. '�i.0 i •" 1...:M1'1_ :. ,g '! 3; :"'• •..n" +, A ,.7 15 lJf :C'••;,'ii•
<br />
|