|
Frank Belecky, 892 Maderia Drive, commended the applicant for what appears will be an
<br /> attractive project. However, he did not think many people would be able to afford a house
<br /> of this nature, and asked that the applicants try to develop something affordable. He was
<br /> also concerned about the water supply for the project as the State does not have enough
<br /> water as it is. He was concerned that the project would be built; then ultimately cause the
<br /> existing Pleasanton residents to have an inadequate supply of water, along with a higher cost.
<br /> He was also concerned about the noise and danger during the construction stage from early
<br /> in the morning until night. He suggested that the project be conditioned to use Stanley
<br /> Boulevard or Isabel Avenue for use by construction workers.
<br /> Mr. Belecky asked staff whether there would be construction on the east side of Highway 84.
<br /> Mr. Swift replied that at this time there are no plans for development on the east side of
<br /> Highway 84. The developer has a proposed plan, but it has not been approved yet by the
<br /> County or City; and it is not part of the plan being shown tonight.
<br /> Mr. Belecky asked if Signature Properties is planning on developing or just selling the lots.
<br /> Mr. McKeehan responded that the intent is to sell 650 lots, with about 200 retained for
<br /> construction by Signature Properties.
<br /> Debra Barker, 2947 Chardonnay Drive, said her primary concerns are: noise during
<br /> construction; straightening of Vineyard Avenue and possible dangers connected with that;
<br /> increased traffic; traffic congestion at Bernal Avenue and Stanley Boulevard; and possible
<br /> impacts on the school system.
<br /> Robert Cordtz, 262 W. Angela, expressed concerns about water usage at the project and how
<br /> that might affect the residents of Pleasanton. He urged the developer to look for innovative
<br /> ways of obtaining water for the project.
<br /> Ray Diaz, 750 E. Vineyard Avenue, Livermore, stated he has no problem with the project;
<br /> however, he wished for the City and the developer to take note that Alameda County
<br /> overlooked the fact that his home exists. He said he has a two acre parcel which is about 24
<br /> ft. from Vineyard Avenue or the southwest side of Highway 84. He asked that somebody
<br /> meet with him to discuss the situation before anything is done. He called attention to his
<br /> letter included in the staff report. He requested that his acreage be annexed into the City of
<br /> Pleasanton. Commissioner Wright responded to Mr. Diaz's concern, noting that Planning
<br /> Commission could recommend beginning the annexation process.
<br /> Randy Harris represented the Foley Ranch, which is adjacent to the project. He requested
<br /> that the Foleys be allowed to air their concerns at some point. He expressed concerns about
<br /> comments and some discussion concerning the possible location of a sports park adjacent to
<br /> the ranch. He did not think a park would be compatible with the ranch. He said the plan
<br /> shown tonight is contrary to the County's plan, and would like to discuss this matter.
<br /> Minutes Planning Commission
<br /> November 20, 1991
<br /> Page 7
<br /> ,
<br /> other factors, at the discretion' ''` tconditional use permit nay be
<br /> � '� on tt'e Planning Director, this
<br /> H Fav I
<br /> I:;r,;�•'..snk.» submitted to the Planning Commission for their subsequent
<br /> ! �=�" .; .-
<br /> r . ie�N at a public hearing. If necessary, the Commission may
<br /> ;n 1. 3•a
<br /> �• .�¢:'�' taadi.Yy or add conditions of approval to mitigate such impacts,
<br /> `i:..brti
<br /> Lve ,• '1:, or may re'. ;.k said conditional use permit.
<br /> . t ,. 5. The applicant. shall obtain all applicable City permits for the
<br /> ;r�?� eoperation.,
<br /> �a •,��_ •�;;;.! �.3:S.t^ prior to the commencement of o;�Ft!'u
<br /> •
<br /> r '.ti . ii "I' 6. tic alcohol shell be consumed outside e the establishment.
<br /> .
<br /> ;- - nee,',. 7. Outdoor trash dumping shall not occur between the hours of
<br /> " f�,:,; the Planning
<br /> .tj:.:' . 10:00 ' a.m. , unless '.'t is ld b;:
<br /> r, p.m. rind v:JO
<br /> ' • ' ., r- that the sound levels from dum¢�..ng trash are less
<br /> �'' .,��,..3�.�,. IJirectc .
<br /> .'N. Yf ,e. than 60 dBW..
<br /> 11,
<br /> 41
<br /> yyIiir.4-41
<br /> l.'{ur - ,rt. -•s ,, P}. >;;AV tt„` 9 ,..,.:y�,42A"!; 5 F'J't C A7 1y_J +"� A 7, x.V. •,A.:4,..1-4.5r,-; Ri+ `04.:.. S! +P.,�'`Jf ,:,:t, ,:t .i , +4. 1v , i vt "..1, rdy� S a ..u..'; , f+ v,• i e,,),,,,-.ik• . 1 •�S ,ilu�''y�f.��,t e.
<br /> ,<. j Jr,[`(r'j r .r : . . '.<:+t;C P ;••*• r Y ''fl��'t�:y ' p, ','',4t SQA' iM`r,. *t. n �.' 7 'w...
<br /> ..,.�, ,� .i'. ... ('. i,D,. gjjth ' „ , ...sr a '`4 ..::�••.
<br /> '•P 1 '�.+;,`.++ ii,± ref'•}�K•xi.�fl�t •A)�'{'. •Vit.-.C v".� :4 ' �'x'�A°y f'...rl .,. `L.� . `l ''. '�i.0 i •" 1...:M1'1_ :. ,g '! 3; :"'• •..n" +, A ,.7 15 lJf :C'••;,'ii•
<br />
|