My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix A - E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 11:41:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 11:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
14
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 1-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
14 ATTACHMENT 6 - Appendix F - I
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\021522
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 73 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />Environmental Issues <br />Prior 1998 <br />HVSP FEIR <br />Determination <br />CEQA Section 15183(b) Criteria <br />Effect <br />Peculiar to <br />Project or <br />Site? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Effect? <br />New <br />Significant <br />Off-site, <br />Cumulative <br />Impact? <br />New <br />Information, <br />More Severe <br />Adverse <br />Impact? <br />4.3 Air Quality <br />Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or <br />air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation <br />of the applicable air quality plan? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net <br />increase of any criteria pollutant for <br />which the project region is non- <br />attainment under an applicable federal <br />or State ambient air quality standard? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial <br />pollutant concentrations? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No No <br />d) Result in other emissions (such as those <br />leading to odors or) adversely affecting a <br />substantial number of people? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No No <br /> <br />a) Air Quality Plan Conflict <br />Would the project: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? <br />The 1998 HVSP FEIR found that the HVSP would not conflict with any applicable Air Quality Plans <br />(AQPs) since the HVSP was anticipated in the 1996 Pleasanton General Plan. The 1998 HVSP FEIR <br />notes that full buildout under the HVSP would include 41 more housing units than anticipated in the <br />1996 General Plan, and concludes that this would not result in a significant impact because it was <br />not significant in the context of regional growth. The current Pleasanton General Plan (the 2005 <br />Pleasanton Plan 2025) was adopted in July 2009 and was most recently amended in August 2019. <br />The 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 includes the HVSP, which anticipated the development of 22 units <br />with the potential for ADUs in the Spotorno Flat Area. Similarly, the most recent Bay Area Air Quality <br />Management District (BAAQMD) AQP is the Clean Air Plan adopted in April 2017, which includes the <br />growth forecasts provided in the 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025, including those of the HVSP. The City of <br />Pleasanton adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in 2012. While the Pleasanton CAP does not <br />currently meet the requirements for being a Qualified GHG Reduction Plan per BAAQMD <br />requirements, it did meet the requirements in 2018 when the previous analysis was conducted. <br />As the currently proposed project would result in the same number of dwelling units (22 plus ADUs) <br />as were evaluated in the HVSP for the Spotorno Flat Area, in terms of the analysis performed in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.