Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton–Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project <br />Initial Study/Consistency Checklist Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 47 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480021/Consistency Checklist/21480021 Spotorno Ranch Consistency Checklist ScreenCheck.docx <br />SECTION 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(b) states that: <br />In approving a project meeting the requirements of this section, a public agency <br />shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency <br />determines, in an initial study or other analysis: <br />(1) Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located; <br />(2) Were not analyzed as significant effects in a Prior FEIR on the zoning action, <br />general plan, or community plan, with which the project is consistent; <br />(3) Are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were <br />not discussed in the Prior FEIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or <br />zoning action; or <br />(4) Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new <br />information which was not known at the time the FEIR was certified, are <br />determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the Prior <br />FEIR. <br /> <br />The following pages of this document contain an Environmental Checklist that examines the project’s <br />potential environmental effects within the parameters outlined at CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15183(b). The “Prior FEIR” used for comparison is the 1998 HVSP FEIR, certified by the City of <br />Pleasanton on June 16, 1998, including all impact determinations and significance thresholds utilized <br />therein. <br />Some of the impact analyses and conclusions from the previously-circulated 2018 Draft Subsequent <br />Environmental Impact Report (Draft SEIR) for a 39-unit project on the same site were provided for <br />informational purposes to aid in the analysis of the proposed project.