My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:59:08 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
located between Martin Avenue and the gravel quarry. Furthermore, the analysis <br />concluded that affordable housing, which is recommended by the General Plan, <br />was not feasible with large -lot, single-family developments in this area. <br />Thus, the proposed density, although slightly above the mid -point, is consistent with that <br />conferred at the time of the PUD-LDR zoning adopted by the City, with no additional <br />community benefit required, consistent with the City Council's approval. Staff also notes <br />a similar approach was taken with the virtually identical approvals of 2201 Martin <br />Avenue (PUD -97), 2207 Martin Avenue (PUD -140), and 2215 Martin Avenue (PUD - <br />141). <br />A detailed analysis and discussion of the proposed project including discussion of <br />consistency with the General Plan and zoning, site design, building design, landscaping, <br />fencing, noise, etc. are included in the attached Planning Commission agenda report, <br />Attachment 4. <br />As proposed, the project would promote General Plan goals, policies, and programs <br />related to encouraging appropriate infill development, and would allow reuse of a vacant <br />and underutilized parcel that is adjacent to existing residential development. As detailed <br />in the Planning Commission agenda report, staff and the Commission concluded the <br />proposed siting of the new dwelling and site improvements are consistent with applicable <br />density and development standards. The Commission further found the design of the <br />project to be consistent with the nearby streetscape, it would provide adequate off-street <br />parking, and it would be appropriately scaled, and compatible with the neighborhood. <br />Growth Management Agreement <br />The City's Growth Management Ordinance (GMO) regulates the number of residential <br />building permits that can be issued each year to assure a predictable growth rate while <br />providing housing. The GMO currently allows a total of 235 Growth Management Unit <br />Allocations (GMUAs) to be issued per year. The proposal is to add two single-family <br />residences. As such, the net increase on the lot is two single-family homes, which is <br />within the total allocation available for 2022. Attachment 3 is the draft resolution for <br />approval of the Growth Management Agreement. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br />1,000 -foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. The noticing map is included <br />as Exhibit C in Attachment 4. At the time this report was published, staff has not received <br />any public comments. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Initial <br />Study/Negative Declaration adopted by the City Council for RZ-97-2 in conformance <br />with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There are no <br />substantial changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project is being <br />undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.