Laserfiche WebLink
increase the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new <br />information of substantial importance which was unknown at the time the Initial <br />Study/Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council regarding the project or its <br />effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives. Any previously identified effects or impacts <br />are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitigation measures incorporated into <br />the project's design or imposed on the project pursuant to the conditions of approval. <br />Therefore, no new environmental document accompanies this agenda report. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal and found the proposed <br />density, development standards, architecture, site design, lot configuration, and <br />landscaping are consistent with the Zoning, and General Plan goals and policies <br />including all regulations and design guidelines. The Planning Commission also found <br />that the architectural style and design of the new home was appropriate for the area. <br />Therefore, the Planning Commission recommended approval. <br />SElen <br />iedblark <br />Director of Community <br />Development <br />Attachments: <br />Fiscal Review: Appro d by: <br />Tina Olson Brian Dolan <br />Director of Finance Interim City <br />Manager <br />1. Draft City Council Ordinance for PUD Development Plan (PUD -140) <br />a. Exhibit A, Draft Conditions of Approval <br />b. Exhibit B, Project Plans <br />2. Draft City Council Resolution for Minor Subdivision <br />3. Draft City Council Resolution for Growth Management Allocation <br />4. December 8, 2021 Planning Commission Agenda Report <br />5. January 5, 2022 Planning Commission Memorandum <br />6. January 12, 2022 Planning Commission Draft Minute Excerpt <br />Page 10 of 10 <br />