My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:59:08 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
units would reflect an equivalent density of 1.2 dwelling units per acre, which is <br />consistent with the low-density designation. <br />The General Plan also provides goals, policies, and programs that encourage <br />residential infill development in appropriate locations. <br />Overall Community Development <br />General Plan Goal 2: Achieve and maintain a complete well-rounded community <br />of desirable neighborhoods, a strong employment base, and a variety of <br />community facilities. <br />General Plan Policy 4: Allow development consistent with the General Plan Land <br />Use Map. <br />General Plan Policy 10: Provide flexibility in residential development standards <br />and housing type consistent with the desired community character. <br />General Plan Program 10.1: Use planned unit development (PUD) zoning for <br />residential properties that have unique characteristics or to accommodate <br />development that does not fit under standard zoning classifications. <br />• Zoning: The site is zoned PUD-LDR, which, per the PMC, would require <br />development standards for the project to be established as part of the PUD <br />development plan. <br />The proposed density is above the mid -point density for the LDR designation of 1 du/ac <br />which would typically require a public amenity with development, per the General Plan. <br />Examples of amenities include the provision of affordable housing, and dedication <br />and/or improvement of parkland, open space, and/or trails beyond the standard <br />requirements. However, at its public hearing on the prezoning (Ordinance No. 1709 for <br />RZ-97-2) the City Council supported staff and Planning Commission recommendations <br />of a density of "approaching two dwelling units per acre, i.e. 1.999 ... du/acre" for the <br />entire areas subject to annexation, including this site. At the time, the Planning <br />Commission and City Council concurred with staff's recommendation that no additional <br />amenities or benefits needed to be provided in conjunction with the density conferred, <br />based on the following factors: <br />1. The average density of the area surrounding the prezoning project area is 2 <br />d u/ac. <br />2. The difference between 2 du/ac versus 1 du/ac would be approximately 33 more <br />dwellings across the entire area. Although a substantial difference, available land <br />designated for LDR land uses which, when averaged with these sites, would <br />achieve the 1 du/ac citywide average for this land use designation; and <br />3. Parkland, open space, and trails were already in place and available in the area <br />to offset the greater number of units. These facilities included the five -acre <br />neighborhood park at the end of Martin Avenue and the 150 -foot -wide buffer area <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.