My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
011822
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2022 4:45:35 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 10:42:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
12 ATTACHMENTS 1-2
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\011822
12 ATTACHMENTS 3-4
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\011822
12 ATTACHMENTS 5-7
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\011822
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The sites selection process will entail a progressive narrowing or refinement of the <br />inventory list. Therefore, at this relatively early stage, it is recommended that a broader <br />inventory of sites be identified, with a total capacity beyond the shortfall estimate. <br />Providing a broader range of sites will provide the City with flexibility to adjust the list as <br />the project moves through various stages of review. <br />Later in the update process, and prior to the final adoption of the Housing Element in <br />early 2023, the City Council has the ability and discretion to decide the final list of sites to <br />include in the inventory. In concept, the inventory could include more sites than strictly <br />necessary to meet the RHNA. In the 6t" Cycle, many cities are opting to include this type <br />of "buffer" of additional sites capacity, particularly in light of the more stringent "no net <br />loss" provisions of state law'. Pleasanton could choose to either include a built-in "buffer" <br />of extra residential zoning capacity among the sites identified and adopted as part of the <br />Housing Element; or to create a list of potential additional sites that are not included in the <br />Housing Element at the time of adoption, but eligible to be considered at a future date for <br />rezoning if needed. By including them in the CEQA analysis, and otherwise vetting them <br />through a public process that deems the sites conceptually suitable for housing, this "back <br />up" list will simplify the process of selecting future sites in the event that additional re - <br />zonings are needed to address "no net loss." <br />Following this approach, at this early stage of the site selection process, the Planning <br />Commission supported staff's recommendation to identify sites with zoning capacity <br />sufficient to provide at least 50 percent more units than the identified gap (i.e. <br />approximately 4,715 units), understanding that this will ultimately be narrowed to be <br />closer to the actually needed number of sites, following the CEQA analysis and with <br />adoption of the Housing Element. <br />Default Densities and Capacity Assumptions, <br />The inventory process requires the City to identify the density ranges at which each site <br />will be developed. As discussed below, staff has recommended potential densities for <br />each site, including low, low/medium, medium and high density ranges, assigned based <br />on location and other site characteristics. <br />With respect to the various income categories for which the inventory must show <br />adequate capacity, State law provides for a series of "default densities" which are zoning <br />minimums that, if applied, can be assumed to yield lower-income housing units2. In <br />communities like Pleasanton, the minimum default density for units to be counted as <br />lower-income units in the inventory is 30 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and between 20 <br />and 29 du/ac to be counted as moderate -income units. Although the City may count all <br />units in the inventory zoned at 30 units per acre or more as affordable or lower-income (or <br />t "No net loss" provisions are a component of the Housing Accountability Act, which, whenever a project is approved <br />with few units, or less affordability than cited in the Housing Element, requires findings to be made that adequate <br />zoning capacity remains in the inventory to accommodate the units not built, or for the City to re -zone additional sites <br />to accommodate that number of units. <br />2 Additional site size requirements also apply, see Attachment 1 for more information. <br />Page 4 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.