Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton PFAS Treatment & Wells Rehabilitation Project <br />City of Pleasanton <br />JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. 2 <br />Inc. (Certification No. 2153). The preparation of the soil samples for chemical analysis will be in <br />accordance with the applicable specifications. <br /> <br />Soil Chemical Analysis Test Methods <br /> <br />Chemical Analysis ASTM Method <br />Chlorides D4327 <br />pH D4972 <br />Resistivity (as received <br />and @ 100% saturation) <br />G57 <br />Sulfate D4327 <br />Redox Potential D1498 <br /> <br /> <br />Evaluate the results of the chemical analysis and determine the corrosivity of the soils along the pipeline <br />alignments to the proposed materials of construction (i.e. mortar-coated steel, dielectric-coated steel and <br />concrete cylinder pipe, etc.). <br /> <br />4. Conduct in-situ soil resistivities at an approximate 2,000 ft. interval along the pipeline alignment and at <br />facility locations using the Wenner 4-pin technique. In-situ resistivities will be measured at 2.5’, 5’, 7.5’, <br />10’, 15’ and 20’ depths using a Soil Resistivity Meter. Barnes layer calculations will be performed to <br />determine the corrosivity of the different soil layers to the proposed pipeline materials. Review the plans <br />and profiles for the new water pipelines prepared by Carollo for construction details and proposed pipeline <br />materials and determine the suitability of the proposed materials based on the collected field and <br />laboratory data. <br /> <br />5. Contact adjacent utility owners, as needed, for coordination and requirements. If needed, we will contact <br />other foreign utility owners, such as PG&E, that present potential stray current problems and discuss <br />design measures to mitigate interference between the new water pipelines and these existing utilities. It <br />is important to provide measures to ensure that the new water pipeline is protected against stray-current <br />interference from any foreign pipelines. <br /> <br />6. Prepare Corrosion Engineering Technical Memorandum which will provide a summary of the field data <br />collected along with the chemical analysis of the soil samples and an analysis of this data. The potential <br />for corrosion on the various material options for the new water pipelines will be determined based on the <br />analysis and recommendations for the long-term prevention of corrosion will be included for all pipe <br />material options. All fieldwork and recommendations will be in compliance with applicable NACE and <br />Local Water District Design Standards. <br /> <br />7. Prepare Corrosion Engineering Technical Memorandum outlining corrosion control design approach for <br />each pipe option including appropriate stray current corrosion control requirements, if any. <br /> <br />8. The Manpower Estimate spreadsheet for each pipeline option will be prepared to compare costs for <br />corrosion control for each pipe type option. <br /> <br />9. Provide a workshop to summarize recommendations for City of Pleasanton staff. <br /> <br />10. Alisal Wells and Pipeline Alternative: Conduct in-situ soil resistivities at an approximate 2,000 ft. interval <br />along the pipeline alignment and at the well locations using the Wenner 4-pin technique. In-situ <br />resistivities will be measured at 2.5’, 5’, 7.5’, 10’, 15’ and 20’ depths using a Soil Resistivity Meter. Barnes <br />layer calculations will be performed to determine the corrosivity of the different soil layers to the proposed <br />pipeline materials. Collect near surface soil sample for chemical analysis (see Item 3., above). Review