20 - Laserfiche WebLink

DISCUSSION: SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT TO DATE As noted in the introduction, the Housing Element process launched in May, including substantial effort to engage the public and solicit input on the update process, as well as to understand key issues, concerns and community preferences around housing in Pleasanton. Staff has prepared an initial summary of outreach completed to date as information to the City Council, including the results of the June 24 Community Meeting, Stakeholder Meetings, and the Communitywide Survey conducted on-line from late June through mid-August. Each of these is summarized below, and presented in full in Attachments 4, 5 and 6, respectively. These results will also be presented to the Housing Commission on September 16, and Planning Commission on September 21. Community Meeting, June 24, 2021 An initial community meeting led by City staff was held on June 24 with the intent to introduce the Housing Element Update to the community, provide an opportunity for early input, and learn about initial concerns and ideas related to housing in Pleasanton. The meeting was held via Zoom and included several breakout rooms to gain direct feedback from the attendees in a smaller group setting. A complete meeting summary can be found in Attachment 4. Stakeholder Meetings, August 10, August 12, and August 24, 2021 Stakeholder group meetings are intended to give the City greater insight into the highest priority considerations for the Housing Element update from the perspective of various stakeholders, and to better understand local challenges and opportunities that may not be effectively gathered in a larger group setting. Two stakeholder group meetings, led by the professional services team, were conducted in August: one with housing developers and one with housing and community services providers. The meeting was held via Zoom and included breakout rooms for the service provider group to allow for smaller group discussion. The developers group highlighted some of the aspects they felt added difficulty to the process of building in Pleasanton, including City review procedures (particularly the PUD process), City and other outside agency fees, and challenges securing labor, as well as the cost of materials. The service providers input focused on the significant needs of many of Pleasanton's populations, and specific housing needs of certain populations (like seniors, those experiencing homelessness, and those with developmental disabilities). Staff also attended and presented to local institutions and businesses at the Chamber of Commerce's Economic Development & Government Relations (EDGR) meeting on August 24. The general consensus of comments indicated that local businesses are having a difficult time recruiting employees and young professionals recently out of college or just entering their fields due to the lack of housing affordable to entry level workers. In addition, many members commented on the need to focus on workforce housing (such as smaller units) to meet the needs of local employees and create more housing opportunities "affordable by design". A complete meeting summary can be found in Attachment 5. Page 9 of 11