My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
092121
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 11:19:00 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 11:16:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGFUO - Public comments provided to the Planning Commission for the July 28, 2021, meeting <br />.1A <br />PLEASANTOIJi <br />COMMERCE! <br />x <br />July 28, 2021 <br />City of Pleasanton Planning Commissioners <br />City of Pleasanton <br />P.0, Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br />RE: Proposed Amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan's Active Ground Floor Use Overlay <br />Dear City of Pleasanton Planning Commissioners: <br />This letter is regarding the recommended changes city staff are proposing to the Downtown Specific Plan's Active <br />Ground Floor Use Overlay that will be discussed at your July 28`h meeting. <br />The chamber has always been a strong supporter of increasing downtown vitality by advocating for more parking, <br />cleaning up inconsistencies in the building code and providing a designated city staff liaison to assist downtown small <br />businesses. The chamber has not been a supporter of the Active Ground Floor Use Overlay and asks that you seriously <br />consider if now is the right time to increase the retail mandate to 60% versus the current 25%. With increased <br />ecommerce from companies like Amazon, the demand for retail space will continue to decline, providing another <br />example why an increased mandate does not make sense at this time. <br />However, we do support staffs recommendation that any new active use should be "front -facing" and a visible <br />business operation, offer a point-of-sale mechanism, and business hours that are consistent with retail and restaurant <br />uses. Signage should also match the active use and any non-active use signage should be secondary to the active use. <br />To assist city staff in managing tenant space that may be shared by a non-active use, both businesses should be <br />required to obtain separate business licenses. <br />Lastly, we believe that personal services such as barbershops, beauty salons and spas be included as an active use <br />since they generally create more foot traffic than a stand-alone restaurant or small retail store. By leaving them out of <br />the active use definition, we are limiting our downtown vitality, <br />We believe more flexibility and fewer mandates are warranted as many small businesses are still struggling to recover <br />from the pandemic and therefore request you do notsupport increasing the active use mandate to 60%. <br />Sincerely, <br />Steve Van Dorn <br />President/CEO <br />,;vww.pleasanton.oig <br />777 Peters Avenue • Pleasanton, CA 94566 • Phone: (925) 846-5858 <br />Distributed to City Council for the September 7, 2021, meeting Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.