My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
092121
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 11:19:00 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 11:16:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A GFUO - Public comments provided to the Planning Commission for the July 28, 2021, meeting <br />McNellis Partners A Vaccjnc for Rctai]? <br />2 of 2 <br />http://menellis.com/newslailiclela-var-cine-for-retuil <br />In particular, tracdy cities must abandon their mixod-use fantasies Toa much pad retail — space that will never lease — has already been <br />constructed by reluctant office and apartment developers. 1Athy? They were forced to by starry-eyed urban planners dreaming of turning their <br />towns into Manhattan a west side. For retail to have a fighbng chance, it needs three things great access, visibility and traffic (whether <br />vehicular or pedestrian) Few mixed-use projects offer even one of these prerequisites. <br />-F .ond, loasern up the zoning' isn't as cal,-hy as do no harm but It's as Impprfant Tradillcnal retail zoning requ-res trial a mamiant 1 dually <br />segs stuff. haril goods like books or soft like COIN ng. Cities need to face the reality tha:those are the types of businesses on the double - <br />secret endangered list, the trsea m est vulnerable to e-commerce: Once they go, they're gone. Mandating only 'true retailers' in a shopping <br />district is like building a bird no use for passengpl pigeons Won't marter txfm pnmy it is, ftyra sill; extinct <br />How do you loosen rip the zoning'v Easy: First you shrink the retail districts themselves, then you allow in any business that has a customer, <br />a patient, a client, a student, or any sod of visitor at all. You drop your prohibibon against banks and financial services, you permit dentists. <br />travel agents, gyms, yoga studios, doctors — even lawyers and palm reapers -- every personal service imaginable to oc; upy those <br />othoivdse untillable retail srorefronts <br />Also, if you roily wish to halp your retail districts, you drop the prohibitions against chain stoves Every chain store in America started as a <br />single store. Prohibiting chains is simply reclining success in the hope of keeping a given neighborhood unique. II you wish to have a not -so. <br />unique collection of empty slorerrontS, you maintain the prohibition against stores at which people actually want to shop. <br />'Third, cut the regulations" is less catchy still, but the fancy cities should lake a page from the provincial towns that go all-out to spark <br />development A few years ego, we approached a small town on Interstate 5 about a superniarkat we wanted to build 'When can you break <br />ground?' was the city manager's only question. And, true to his word, the town approved our plans as fast as we could submit them. <br />National retailers have rhoicas about where to locale, where to expend their efforts Ogen, a given city is no more appea:irx7 than 20 others <br />And retailers have feelings (most of them, anyway); they want to go where they feel welcomed. Hence, the great appeal of Texas <br />There is no panacea, but weth effort and morn understanding on the part of cities, retail need not circle the drain <br />W1/2021, 12:51 PM <br />Distributed to City Council for the September 7, 2021, meeting Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.