6_Exhibits A & B - Laserfiche WebLink

4. Environmental Impacts/Impact on Future Residents a. Site would not expose future residents to odor impacts from any existing or known future source b. The project is anticipated to meet noise standards with no or with reasonable mitigation measures (if adjacent to or across the street from freeway or rail line = 0) c. The site is not within BAAQMD's air quality screening distance for new sensitive receptors d. The site is within the standard response time for emergency services as identified by the General Plan e. The site is outside of the following natural hazard areas (0 or 1 point for each) • Site is not within Alquist Priolo zone or fault zone as identified in the General Plan • Site is not within earthquake induced landslide zone as identified in the General Plan • Site is not within a Special Fire Protection Area as identified in the General Plan • Site is not within a 100-year Flood Zone 5. Impact on Trees, Biological or Historic Resources a. The site will not likely require significant tree removal or mitigation. b. The site will not likely require an environmental analysis related to loss of suitable habitat for, or the taking of, sensitive or special status species, or is unlikely to be significantly constrained by the potential presence of sensitive habitat or species c. The site will not likely require an analysis related to impacts on historic resources 6. Height and Mass Compatibility a. The project (for higher-density housing sites, assuming three stories are proposed) will be no more than one story higher than the average number of stories of all adjacent residential development including residential development across a residential collector or local street (If not applicable=1) b. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of the proposed project (for higher-density housing sites, assuming an FAR of 80%) will be less than twice of the allowed midpoint density FAR for development on all adjacent sites and sites across a residential collector or local street (not including parks/designated open space) (If not applicable=l) c. Site is not adjacent to or across (a residential collector or local street) from one or more existing single-family detached residential homes. 7. Interest in Site a. (For sites intended to accommodate housing at a density of 30 DUA or more) Property owner/developer has expressed interest in the site for high density residential development (If not applicable=l) EXHIBIT A Draft Scoring Criteria for 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update Sites ion review and provide a recommendation on the draft sites selection criteria for the 6th Cycle Housing Element, including any modifications, additions or deletions to the draft criteria as presented in Exhibit A. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this item was published in The Valley Times. This item was also identified in the Pleasanton Weekly's "Agenda Highlights" for upcoming public meetings, and an email Additional analysis in topic areas as views and aesthetics will be completed as part of the CEQA review, and will be brought forward for consideration in future evaluation phases. Housing Element Update Planning Commission 7 of 8 they reflect both the general planning principle that residential uses should be convenient to schools, parks, and other amenities, and also respond to criteria in the TCAC program that Housing Element Update Planning Commission 5 of 8 discussion regarding massage businesses that arose during the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) update, and concerns then about an overabundance of personal services. She Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 July 28, 2021