My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
6_Exhibits A & B
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
08-25
>
6_Exhibits A & B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2021 12:22:02 PM
Creation date
8/18/2021 12:22:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/25/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
6
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\08-25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br /> Draft Scoring Criteria for 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update Sites Selection <br /> Yes=1 Point, No=0 Points <br /> 1. Site Size and Infill Criteria (per Housing and Community Development Criteria) <br /> a. (For sites intended to accommodate housing at a density of 30 DUA or more) The <br /> site, or the portion of a site to be rezoned, is larger than 0.5 acres in size, and less <br /> than 10 acres in size. (If not applicable1=1) <br /> b. (For sites intended to accommodate housing at a density of 30 DUA or more) The <br /> site is 1 acre or more in size allowing for more State/Federal financing <br /> opportunities (If not applicable=1) <br /> c. Site is an infill site (Site is located within the Urban Growth Boundary and adjoins <br /> urbanized land use for at least 75% of its perimeter (adjoins means adjacent to, or <br /> only separated by an improved public right-of-way.) <br /> d. Site is not anticipated to require off-site sewer, water or dry utilities infrastructure <br /> improvements. <br /> 2. Proximity to Modes of Transportation' <br /> a. Site is within 1/2 mile of a BART station <br /> b. Site is within 3 mile of a BART station <br /> c. Site is within 1/ mile of transit stop with 15 minute headway to a BART station <br /> d. Site is within 1/ mile of transit stop with 30 minute headway <br /> e. Site is adjacent to an existing bike facility (Class I shared use path, Class II bicycle <br /> lane or buffered bicycle lane, Class III bicycle route or Class IV separated bikeway) <br /> f. Site is within % mile of freeway on-ramp <br /> 3. Proximity to Services and Amenities <br /> a. Site is within 1/2 mile of an existing or approved grocery store selling staples, fresh <br /> meat and fresh produce, including a multipurpose store with a grocery section <br /> selling these products. <br /> b. Site is within 1/2 mile of an existing elementary school <br /> c. Site is within 1/2 mile of an existing middle school <br /> d. Site is within 1 mile of an existing high school <br /> e. Site is not within the enrollment area of a school with insufficient current or <br /> projected capacity, as determined by Pleasanton Unified School District based on <br /> current demographic and other studies <br /> f. Site is within 1/2 mile of an existing public park or open space area as identified in <br /> the General Plan or a planned improvement in the City's Capital Improvement <br /> Program <br /> 1 Only applicable to sites intended for high-density housing, all other sites receive"1" score. This note <br /> also applies to criteria 1 b, 6a, 6b and 7. <br /> 2 Distances measured "as the crow flies" <br />nges to City policies and programs for inclusion in the Housing Element. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Staff is recommending that the Commission review and provide a recommendation on the draft <br /> sites selection criteria for the 6th Cycle Housing Element, including any modifications, additions <br /> or deletions to the draft criteria as presented in Exhibit A. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this item was published in The Valley Times. This item was also identified in the <br /> Pleasanton Weekly's "Agenda Highlights" for upcoming public meetings, and an email <br /> Additional analysis in topic areas as views and aesthetics will be completed as part of the CEQA review, and will <br /> be brought forward for consideration in future evaluation phases. <br /> Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 8 <br /> they reflect both the general planning principle that residential uses should be convenient to <br /> schools, parks, and other amenities, and also respond to criteria in the TCAC program that <br /> Housing Element Update Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 8 <br /> discussion regarding massage businesses that arose during the Downtown Specific Plan <br /> (DSP) update, and concerns then about an overabundance of personal services. She <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 July 28, 2021 <br />