My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
081721
>
04 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2021 4:19:24 PM
Creation date
8/12/2021 3:49:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/17/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
04
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2021\081721
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Project No. E9164-04-0 2 - 4 - April 15, 2020 <br />which saturated cohesionless soils are subject to a temporary loss of shear strength due to pore pressure buildup <br />under the cyclic shear stresses associated with intense earthquakes. Primary factors that trigger liquefaction are: <br />moderate to strong ground shaking (seismic source), relatively clean, loose granular soils (primarily poorly graded <br />sands and silty sands), and saturated soil conditions (shallow groundwater). Due to the increasing overburden <br />pressure with depth, liquefaction of granular soils is generally limited to the upper 50 feet of a soil profile. <br /> <br />We evaluated the potential for liquefaction and resultant settlements at the site using the soil boring data and <br />the methodology of Youd et. al. (2001) and Idriss and Boulanger (2006 and 2008). Our evaluation incorporated <br />an earthquake moment magnitude (Mw) of 6.9 and a design groundwater depth of 15 feet. The groundwater <br />depth used in our analysis was assigned based on the soils conditions encountered in soil borings at the site and <br />groundwater conditions reported in previous borings by others. Our recent soil borings did not encountered <br />groundwater. It is our opinion the groundwater previously encountered in borings by others is likely seasonal or <br />intermittent. As such, our evaluation of liquefaction potential is likely conservative. Based on USGS seismic <br />design criteria for 2019 CBC, a ground motion/Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of 0.908 g was used in our <br />analysis <br />Our liquefaction analysis identified potentially liquefiable sandy layers below the design ground water depth of <br />15 feet. The liquefiable layers are located between approximately between depths of about 15 and 20 feet below <br />the existing grade and generally exist between overlying clayey alluvium and Tertiary age formational materials <br />below. Consequences of liquefaction can include ground surface settlement, ground loss (sand boils) and lateral <br />slope displacements (lateral spreading). Dublin Creek is located north of the proposed development. Based on <br />our investigation, the liquefiable layers apparently discontinuous in nature towards the creek, therefore, in our <br />opinion, the potential for lateral spreading is considered low. For liquefaction-induced sand boils or fissures to <br />occur, pore water pressure induced within liquefied strata must exert enough force to break through overlying, <br />non-liquefiable layers. Based on methodology recommended by Youd and Garris (1995), which modified and <br />advanced original research by Ishihara (1985), a capping layer of non-liquefiable soil can prevent the occurrence <br />of sand boils and fissures. In our opinion, due to the depth to the liquefiable layer, the potential for ground loss <br />due to sand boils or fissures in a seismic event is considered low. <br />The likely consequence of potential liquefaction at the site is ground surface settlement. Our analysis indicates <br />that, if liquefaction were to occur, total foundation settlements less than 1 inch may result. SP117A indicates <br />that localized differential settlements of up to ⅔ of the total estimated settlements should be assumed for design. <br />We recommend foundations should be designed to accommodate approximately ¾ inch of differential seismic <br />settlement across a horizontal distance of 50 feet. <br />4.5 Landslides <br />The site is not mapped in a State of California Seismic Hazard Zone for seismically induced landslides. We did <br />not observe overt evidence of global instability in slopes at the site and the slopes within the Dublin Creek <br />drainage are heavily vegetated with mature trees. We consider the potential for landslides impacting proposed <br />structures at the site to be generally low. <br /> <br />4.6 Tsunamis and Seiches <br />The site is not located within a coastal area. Therefore, tsunamis (seismic sea waves) are not considered a <br />significant hazard at the site.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.