3 - Laserfiche WebLink

side of Stoneridge Drive, and the east side of Hopyard Road. The corner location provides convenient vehicle access to enter/exit the site. The Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and determined a traffic study is not required. However, the summer camp would end at 4 p.m. Monday-Friday, which is within the evening traffic peak hours. As such, traffic fees may be required for PM peak, if warranted based on observed traffic. Additionally, should the operation deviate from the provided narrative (Exhibit B), review from the City's Traffic Engineer would be required to assess whether additional fees and/or a traffic study would be required. A condition has been added to address this item. Maximum Capacity The applicant proposes a maximum of 50 people at one time. The Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) has reviewed the proposal and the existing floor plan. Given the floor plan shows only one exit from the common area, LPFD would limit the maximum capacity to 49 people at one time. Staff has discussed this requirement with the applicant and added a condition to address it. Noise The PMC states a proposed conditional use must be in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. One of those objectives is to "promote the stability of existing land uses that conform with the General Plan and to protect them from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions." As stated by the applicant, sound deadening felt has already been installed in the ceiling of each of the classroom and practice rooms. Staff has included a condition requiring doors be closed but not locked during instruction times. Thus, it is unlikely noise will be an issue. If noise becomes an issue in the future, staff has included a condition which allows the Conditional Use Permit to be amended or revoked. ALTERNATIVES As outlined in the above analysis, staff believes the programs, as proposed and conditioned, would be compatible with the other uses in the vicinity and not create adverse impacts, and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project as proposed and conditioned. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1. Denial of the application. The Commission could deny the proposed program and SMA would maintain the existing operation; or 2. Approval of the CUP with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve the CUP with modified hours of operation and maximum capacity. Staff believes the findings to approve the project could be made as proposed and conditioned, since the project will not adversely impact any existing uses or the surrounding area, and the proposed programs would be compatible with the existing multi-tenant shopping center. Staff recommends neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. P20-0596, 4811 Hopyard Road, Suite G7 Planning Commission Page 7 of 8 mmission for possible mitigation measures (Exhibit A) Possible mitigating conditions could include reducing the number of children, modifying the arrival/departure times, etc. Traffic and Circulation The subject site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive. Access to the site is provided from the west side of Chabot Drive, the north P20-0596, 4811 Hopyard Road, Suite G7 Planning Commission Page 6 of 8 Page 5 of 8 ed to pay prevailing wages if City monies were Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 10 July 14, 2021 2021