3 - Laserfiche WebLink

PROS/CONS Pros Cons Use is consistent with the General Plan and The proposal may increase traffic and zoning designation. parking demand. Provides educational services for school- aged children. HACIENDA OWNERS ASSOCIATION The Hacienda Owners Association has reviewed the application and found it is in substantial compliance with Hacienda's guidelines set forth in the CC&R's (Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions). The Association believes the use, parking, and on-site circulation are compatible with currently approved uses within the subject area and, thereby, approved the proposed use and site changes. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing maps as Exhibit C for reference. At the time this report was published, staff received no comments. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, Class 1; Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, Class 3; and Section 15304, Minor Alternations to Land, Class 4. Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION As proposed and conditioned, staff believes the proposed uses will be compatible with and will not detrimentally affect the existing or future adjacent/nearby uses. Conditions of approval have been included which will ensure the safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. Staff has reviewed the proposed programs and believes there is sufficient parking on-site to accommodate the use. Staff believes the proposed use will fulfill a community need and the proposed location is appropriate. Primary Author Jenny Soo, Associate Planner, 925-931-5615 orjsoo(a�cityofpleasantonca.gov Reviewed/Approved By: Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager Ellen Clark, Community Development Director P20-0596, 4811 Hopyard Road, Suite G7 Planning Commission Page 8 of 8 d conditioned. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1. Denial of the application. The Commission could deny the proposed program and SMA would maintain the existing operation; or 2. Approval of the CUP with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve the CUP with modified hours of operation and maximum capacity. Staff believes the findings to approve the project could be made as proposed and conditioned, since the project will not adversely impact any existing uses or the surrounding area, and the proposed programs would be compatible with the existing multi-tenant shopping center. Staff recommends neither of the two project alternatives above be pursued. P20-0596, 4811 Hopyard Road, Suite G7 Planning Commission Page 7 of 8 mmission for possible mitigation measures (Exhibit A) Possible mitigating conditions could include reducing the number of children, modifying the arrival/departure times, etc. Traffic and Circulation The subject site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive. Access to the site is provided from the west side of Chabot Drive, the north P20-0596, 4811 Hopyard Road, Suite G7 Planning Commission Page 6 of 8 Page 5 of 8 ed to pay prevailing wages if City monies were Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 10 July 14, 2021 2021