My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
4
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
07-14
>
4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2021 3:29:49 PM
Creation date
7/7/2021 10:46:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/14/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
4_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\07-14
4_Exhibits A & C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2021\07-14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conditioned, staff finds the proposal to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan <br /> and zoning district. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, approval with <br /> conditions, or denial of the application to the City Council. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The property at 2207 Martin Avenue is located near the north end of Martin Avenue and is part <br /> of the Mohr-Martin area, generally defined by Martin Avenue, Mohr Avenue, the former <br /> Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and Stoneridge Drive. The Mohr-Martin area comprises <br /> predominantly residential uses of varying densities and home designs. Many of the properties <br /> within the area were originally located in unincorporated Alameda County, but were <br /> progressively annexed into the City of Pleasanton during the 1990's. Thus, many of these <br /> properties were subdivided and developed in conformance to planning, zoning, and <br /> construction standards of Alameda County. <br /> On April 1, 1997, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1709 for RZ-97-2, which prezoned the <br /> subject property to the PUD-LDR District as part of a larger 34.5-acre area, for a maximum <br /> density "approaching" 2.0 dwelling units per acre'. The property was formally annexed into the <br /> City of Pleasanton in 1997. <br /> In 2003, City Council approved PUD-97 at 2201 Martin Avenue, the property immediately north <br /> of the subject site, which included a similar proposal to subdivide a property into two parcels <br /> and retain the existing home and site improvements on the eastern parcel. <br /> In addition to the subject applications being considered for 2207 Martin Ave, two other similar <br /> applications are forthcoming for the properties located at 2215 Martin Avenue (PUD-141) and <br /> 0 Trenery Drive (PUD-142). Staff notes, although similar in scope, these three requests are <br /> unrelated applications for three separate properties and property owners. <br /> SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION <br /> The subject property is a flat, 1.67-acre site located between Martin Avenue and Dennis Drive <br /> and is developed with an approximately 4,173-square-foot two-story home with an attached <br /> garage built in 1977 (see Figure 1). There are several mature trees clustered in the center of <br /> the lot with established landscaping surrounding the existing home. Single-family homes are <br /> located north, south, and west and Alameda Flood Control property is located east, across <br /> Martin Avenue, of the subject site (see Figures 2 and 3). Existing houses in the area are both <br /> one- and two-story and sited appropriately with their respective lot size. <br /> 1 The Agenda Report for this item clarifies the allowable density as "maximum density approaching 2 du/ac(i.e. <br /> 1.999...du/ac). <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079, 2207 Martin Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 10 <br /> 931-3432 <br /> Committee, Commission, and Task Force List Page 2 of 2 July 14, 2021 <br />al feel; 2) <br /> modifications to the roof screening material to reduce the "pop appearance"; and 3) reducing <br /> uniformity by creating a differentiated treatment around the corners and lower base of <br /> buildings, such as stone or masonry work. She requested an inflation increase to the $1 <br /> million amenity contribution. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />e benefits of the location. He referenced the queuing details and <br /> site circulation plan. He discussed efforts to remain compatible with the surrounding <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />k to that level of detail for the circulation, but <br /> staff would work with Simon Properties to ensure they were appropriately located in the <br /> design. Commissioner Pace asked if the driveway finalizations would come back before the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 May 26, 2021 <br />