My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 04202021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 04202021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2021 4:17:05 PM
Creation date
6/3/2021 4:16:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/20/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 20. Consider introduction and waive first reading of an ordinance adopting a voluntary campaign <br /> contribution limit of $1,000 per person and reduce the voluntary campaign expenditure limit to <br /> $15,000 for a council member candidate and $25,000 for a mayoral candidate by amending <br /> Municipal Code Chapter 1.22 <br /> Assistant City Attorney Larissa Seto reported City Council at its last meeting provided direction to staff <br /> regarding Assembly Bill 571 which sets campaign finance limits for local elections. She reported City <br /> Council directed staff to return with a voluntary contribution limit of $1,000 which is lower than the State <br /> limits and to mirror State laws for the definition of "person" and "contribution." She advised the limit <br /> would apply cumulatively to both the candidate individually and any committees controlled by the <br /> candidate. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto advised any unspent funds raised for one election roll over to the next <br /> election cycle but count against some of the contributors mirroring the State's "last in, first out" or "first <br /> in, first out" rules. She reported the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) considered the issue <br /> last week and in a supplemental memorandum stated contributions received before January 1, 2021, <br /> will not count towards the new State limit. She advised staff is proposing applying this guideline to <br /> Pleasanton's proposed voluntary limits. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto explained staff will not be enforcing the voluntary limits but noted <br /> candidates will be asked to verify they are meeting the City's limits when filing campaign statements. <br /> She advised candidates would be required to meet the State's higher contribution limits as enforced by <br /> the FPPC. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto reported staff was also directed to adjust the City's 2008 voluntary <br /> expenditure limit of $1 per voter with an inflation adjustment and noted no candidate exceeded the <br /> $55,000 sum. She reported City Council direction received by staff in March was to set a limit of <br /> $15,000 for a City Council candidate and $25,000 for a mayoral candidate with no future inflation <br /> adjustments. She noted the current code defines an election period as January 1 to December 31 of <br /> the calendar year of a general election. She advised the period for a special election extended from the <br /> date the City Council calls for the special election until 60 days after the special election. She explained <br /> the procedures for voluntary expenditure limit reporting would be the same as for the voluntary <br /> contribution limit. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiries, Assistant City Attorney Seto advised the State's two- <br /> year adjustments to the $4,900 limit would be based upon inflation. She clarified the current ordinance <br /> is for an election period so if someone makes expenditures in an off year, those would not count <br /> towards the limit. She confirmed both City Council and mayoral candidates are seeking the same voters <br /> because Pleasanton has a non-districted City-wide election for all seats. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiry, City Clerk Karen Diaz confirmed the filing fees are the <br /> same for either a City Council or mayoral candidate. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiry, Assistant City Attorney Seto clarified none of the <br /> definitions of expenditure are changing. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiry, City Clerk Karen Diaz confirmed there will be no change <br /> to the current ability for a candidate to pay their filing fees directly therefore it will not count against the <br /> expenditure limit. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch's inquiry, Assistant City Attorney Seto clarified the limits are for <br /> every election period whether it is a two-year mayoral cycle or a four-year City Council cycle. She <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 15 April 20, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.