Laserfiche WebLink
Subsequent phases, the timing of which is to be determined based on the business needs of <br /> 10x Genomics, but is expected to be complete by 2030, would include construction of up to an <br /> additional 231,000 square feet of building area within one or two additional buildings generally <br /> along the east side of the subject site. Exhibit B shows these buildings in approximate <br /> locations, set back between 50 to 100 feet or more from all subject site frontages; however, <br /> Exhibit B also shows a 32-foot minimum setback line, meaning these future buildings may be <br /> shifted anywhere within that minimum setback line as the applicant refines subsequent phases <br /> of their master plan. The applicant proposes the maximum height of these later phase <br /> buildings would be 67 feet to the top of the parapet (82 feet tall with rooftop equipment screen) <br /> (See Figure 12 below for site section details). <br /> The later phases also include construction of a parking structure, providing 1 ,172 parking <br /> spaces, in six levels (five stories, plus rooftop parking) and 80 surface level parking spaces <br /> along the west side of the subject site. See Figure 4 below for additional detail. <br /> In the work session agenda report, staff indicated recorded agreements between the owners of <br /> the adjacent Stoneridge Mall and the subject site require minimum parking ratios of 4.0 spaces <br /> per 1 ,000 square feet to be provided on the subject site. However, the ratio required by the <br /> agreements is relatively high compared to the PMC's typical ratios for uses like those <br /> proposed and could potentially result in the project being "overparked" based on the project's <br /> anticipated employee density, proximity to BART which would reduce employees driving cars, <br /> and the ultimate mix of land uses at full campus master plan buildout. Since the work session, <br /> the applicant has reached agreement with Stoneridge Mall owners to allow for an overall <br /> parking ratio of approximately 3.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the entire campus master <br /> plan development at buildout. <br /> The proposed project would continue to utilize all existing driveways described above, with <br /> most of the vehicular access focused off Springdale Avenue, which would provide the main <br /> ingress and egress to/from parking areas. Building 1 would have entry and drop-off access <br /> from the existing driveway off Stoneridge Mall Road (ring road). Building l's service entry <br /> would be screened and integrated into the building design with access from both the existing <br /> driveways off Springdale Avenue and off Stoneridge Mall Road (ring road). Buildings 2 and 3 <br /> would also have an entry and drop-off point access from the existing driveway off Stoneridge <br /> Mall Road at the existing McWilliams Lane signal intersection. <br /> Buildings 2 and 3 would have a single service entry screened and integrated into the building <br /> design with access from the existing driveway off of Springdale Avenue. All parking (Phase 1 <br /> surface parking, and Phase 2/3 structured and surface parking) would be situated along the <br /> west side of the subject site and accessed primarily from the existing driveway off Springdale <br /> Avenue. <br /> Pedestrian and bicycle facilities would be provided, proposed as a walkway and bicycle lane <br /> along the eastern side of the property, and a shared pedestrian and bicycle path along the <br /> north side of the property, and sidewalks along the west and south sides.' <br /> The Traffic Study recommended a Class IV bicycle facility on the north side of the property. in the form of a two-way <br /> "cycle-track,"however,the applicant has indicated concerns about the feasibility of installing this facility due to the location <br /> of a utilities joint trench along a portion of this frontage,and thus proposed the shared path indicated on the plans. Although <br /> the Class IV facility is preferred by the City Traffic Engineer,the proposed facility could also be deemed an acceptable <br /> alternative. <br /> PUD-139 and P20-0973, 10x Genomics, Inc. Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 32 <br />