3_Exhibits A1-A3 - Laserfiche WebLink

EXHIBIT A2 RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE APPLICATION OF 10X GENOMICS AS FILED UNDER CASE NOS. PUD-139 and P20-0973 WHEREAS, on November 6, 2020, 10x Genomics ("Applicant") submitted applications for: (1) a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning to rezone the parcel at 1701 Springdale Avenue, Pleasanton from C-R (p) (Regional Commercial - peripheral sites) District to PUD-C-O (Planned Unit Development — Commercial-Office) District; (2) a PUD Development Plan to construct up to three new multi-story research and development, office and laboratory buildings totaling approximately 381,000 square feet, a parking structure, and related site improvements over multiple phases; as well as (3) make a finding of General Plan conformity for a related Development Agreement to vest the entitlements for the project for the PUD Rezoning and Development Plan (collectively the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the site is designated Retail/Highway/Service Commercial/Business and Professional Offices in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the site is designated C-R (p) (Regional Commercial - peripheral sites) on the City's zoning map; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, the Planning Commission, following public notice, conducted a work session regarding the Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Sections 15070 and 15072 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, a Draft Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the Project; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2021, Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the IS/MND was sent to interested parties and property owners/residents in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15072; and WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of May 26, 2021, the Planning Commission considered the written agenda report, all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and staff recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written agenda reports and all public comment and testimony: Section 1: Recommends the following findings for approval of Case Nos. PUD-139 and P20-0973. With respect to the Case Nos. above, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council make the following findings and determinations with respect to each of the considerations for a PUD Rezoning and Development Plan as required by Section 18.68.110 of the PMC: egative Declaration and other information in the record and has considered the information contained therein, prior to acting upon or recommending approval of the Project; and s for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US current,or otherwise reliable. s`Latitude Geographies Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION ssioner Allen asked if the company was planning on keeping all three locations in the City or if they would consolidate after the opening of the proposed campus. Mr. Jencek stated the idea was new net growth. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 November 18, 2020 Approvals or that could prevent or 4412928_2 -10- the Project, which list shall include the following items: 4412928_2 -8-