Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2021-07 <br /> Page Two <br /> 1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br /> welfare: <br /> The proposed Project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning <br /> public health, safety, and welfare. The Project would include the installation of all required <br /> on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order to serve the new <br /> development. With the recommended traffic mitigations, the Project will not generate <br /> volumes of traffic that cannot be accommodated by existing City streets and intersections <br /> in the area. The structures would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform <br /> Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. Adequate access would be <br /> provided to the structures for police, fire, and other emergency response vehicles. <br /> Stormwater run-off from the site will be treated before leaving the site. Construction hour <br /> limits and dust suppression requirements would minimize construction impacts on the <br /> surrounding residents and tenants. The proposed development is compatible with the <br /> adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. <br /> Therefore, it is recommended the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests <br /> of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and this finding can be made. <br /> 2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any applicable <br /> specific plan: <br /> The subject site's Land Use Designation of"Retail/Highway/Service Commercial; Business <br /> and Professional Offices" permits office uses. R&D and laboratory uses are not separately <br /> defined or identified as a land use category in the PMC; however, both are listed among a <br /> broad range of potential uses in the PMC's definition of "Light Industrial." R&D and <br /> laboratory uses are not expressly permitted in the C-R (p) District; thus, the Project would <br /> be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation if the subject site is rezoned to <br /> PUD. The proposed 381,000 sq. ft. of building area would result in a floor area ratio (FAR) <br /> of 60% for the subject site. This complies with the 60% maximum FAR permitted for the <br /> designated land use, subject to the project providing sufficient amenities and mitigations to <br /> offset its impacts. With the rezoning, the proposed Development Agreement would be <br /> consistent with the General Plan and also deliver additional amenities and benefits to the <br /> City, and the project environmental review determined that all project impacts would be <br /> adequately mitigated. The proposed Project would further several General Plan Goals, <br /> Programs, and Policies, including: encouraging the reuse of vacant and underutilized <br /> parcels and buildings within existing urban areas; requiring higher residential and <br /> commercial densities in the proximity of transportation corridors and hubs; assuring that <br /> new major commercial, office, and institutional centers are adequately served by transit <br /> and by pedestrian and bicycle facilities; maintaining a complete well-rounded community <br /> of desirable neighborhoods, a strong employment base, and a variety of community <br /> facilities; and zoning sufficient land for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial <br /> uses to support Pleasanton's increasing business activity. It is recommended the City <br /> Council find the proposed development plan is consistent with the City's General Plan, and <br /> this finding can be made. <br /> November 18, 2020 <br />Approvals or that could prevent or <br /> 4412928_2 -10- <br /> the Project, which list shall include the following items: <br /> 4412928_2 -8- <br />