18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Face Coverings From the onset of the COVID restrictions, there has been a continual repetition of messaging relative to the need for individuals to use a face covering when outside of their residence and/or interacting with others who are not members of their household. The City has made substantial efforts to inform and educate the Pleasanton community about the benefits of— and requirements to — wear a face covering when out in public places. Among these messaging tools are continual posts on the City's social platforms, images and videos advocating for the use of face coverings, signage at all City playgrounds and other recreation areas, A-frame and banner signage along Main Street during the weekend street closures, No Mask No Service signage for all Pleasanton businesses to use at their establishment, a letter to the community which urged residents to follow the state and county orders and to wear a mask, and ongoing reminders in the City's weekly community e-newsletter. Additionally, as an employer the City requires all employees and visitors to City offices and facilities to wear a mask except when alone in a closed office. At its meeting on February 2, 2021 a majority of the Council asked to agendize a discussion about additional steps to increase community compliance in using face coverings. It is understandable that members of the community are experiencing 'mask fatigue' and so are not as committed to following the requirement as at the beginning of the pandemic. When considering consequences for not adhering to the requirement to wear a face covering, the County's order makes any violation of the order a misdemeanor punishable by fine, imprisonment or both to be pursued by the district attorney. Other cities in Alameda County have taken additional local action by adopting an administrative fine structure for such citations in their community; the cities of Dublin and Livermore are among them. Both cities report that, like Pleasanton and Alameda County, they are taking an education-centric approach and have focused their specific enforcement efforts on business establishments as the result of escalating response to non-compliance by the business. To date, Livermore has not issued any citations and Dublin has issued less than 10 citations. There are the following options relative to additional steps that the City might be taken toward enforcement of mask wearing', noted from least to most stringent: Continued education about wearing face coverings — This could include sustained messaging about the requirement to use a face covering when in public. Direction to staff. Continue to incorporate 'face covering required' messaging across City information-sharing channels 1 Any requirement for face coverings recognizes there are some individuals exempted by State or County orders (e.g., young children, individuals with health conditions that preclude face coverings, etc.). Page 5 of 6