3_Exhibits A & C - Laserfiche WebLink

EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. PC-2021-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) LOCATED AT 4301 HACIENDA DRIVE SUITE 120, AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. P20-0992 WHEREAS, on November 25, 2020, Lindsey Leblanc, representing Futures Academy, applied for Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a private school with more than 20 students at 4301 Hacienda Drive, Suite 120; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit Development - Industrial/Commercial and Office) District; and WHEREAS, a private school with more than 20 students is a conditionally permitted use in the subject District, and requires Planning Commission approval of a CUP; and WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered relevant exhibits, recommendations of the City staff concerning this application, and received testimony from the applicant and interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written staff reports and all public comment and testimony: Section 1: Findings for Conditional Use Permit Approval With respect to the approval of P20-0992, the Planning Commission makes the following findings as required by Section 18.124.070 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code: A. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. Some of the objectives of the zoning ordinance are to: foster a harmonious, convenient, workable relationship among land uses, protect existing land uses from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions, and ensure public and private lands ultimately are used for the purposes which are most appropriate and beneficial to the City as a whole. As conditioned, the Planning Commission finds the proposed private school would be consistent with these objectives and would create more educational facilities within the City. The facility would be operated to not impact or interfere with the surrounding uses in that the activities, affic or parking study was not required for this project. However, the applicant would be required to pay the City Traffic Impact Fee for increasing the number of students within the private school. If unanticipated impacts are observed, then the application may be brought back to the Planning Commission to impose additional mitigation measures. ALTERNATIVES As outlined above, staff believes the use, as proposed and conditioned, would be compatible with the surrounding businesses and would not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses or properties and recommends the Planning Commission approve the project. However, alternatives to the proposal that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1 . Denial of the application. Such an action would preclude the applicant from increasing the number of students in the private school; or P20-0992, 4301 Hacienda Drive, Suite 120 Planning Commission 6of7