My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT D
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
120120
>
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2020 4:04:28 PM
Creation date
11/23/2020 4:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
16
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link Groups
Link
9:
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT B
Last modified:
11/24/2020 10:18:45 AM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
8:
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT D
Last modified:
11/23/2020 4:04:28 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
7:
16 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT C
Last modified:
11/23/2020 4:01:33 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
5:
16 ATTACHMENT 4
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:54:08 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
4:
16 ATTACHMENT 3
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:51:24 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
3:
16 ATTACHMENT 2
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:48:56 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
2:
16 ATTACHMENT 1
Last modified:
11/23/2020 3:48:06 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
Link
1:
16
Last modified:
12/9/2020 12:20:52 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\120120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Megan Campbell presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired whether the City received sales tax revenue from Public Storage. <br /> Later in his presentation, Project Applicant Patrick Costanzo, Jr. confirmed the City did not <br /> receive sales tax revenue from Public Storage. Commissioner Allen then asked for clarification <br /> on the height of the building in the zone. She asked if, even though buildings up to 40 feet <br /> were allowed in the zone, staff had the discretion to make the building lower if appropriate. <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark confirmed that 40 feet was the maximum height <br /> and the City could consider aesthetics and other impacts in adjusting the height limit <br /> downwards, through the design review and conditional use permit process. <br /> Commissioner Balch expressed concern about the cost of the trail associated with the project <br /> and asked for a description of the expenses. Associate Planner Megan Campbell explained <br /> the Landscape Architect put together the estimate, which included the costs of landscaping, <br /> sidewalks, curb and gutter, and construction. Landscape Architect Assistant Sarah Hosterman <br /> further explained when the Trails Master Plan was created, cost for each identified trail was not <br /> included and it was decided as the opportunity presented itself for trail creation, the cost would <br /> be estimated since the timing of construction could impact the cost. She also explained the <br /> proposed trail was a paved Class One trail, which also increased the cost, but the benefit was <br /> that the trail could be used year round. She further stated the trail was identified by the <br /> community as the highest priority when the Trails Master Plan was completed in May 2019. <br /> She mentioned the prospect of building the proposed trail was very exciting to staff, since they <br /> assumed the opportunity to do so might be limited because that portion of the trail was <br /> expensive to construct. She explained that a soft surface trail with the adjacent Zone 7 land <br /> was a cheaper option but could not be used in the winter. Commissioner Balch inquired if this <br /> section of trail was the last part to be completed and Ms. Hosterman clarified that other parts of <br /> the trail had already been completed and the specific portion was part of the east trail; it <br /> extended from the downtown area to connect to the Iron Horse Trail and Stanley Boulevard. <br /> Some segments remained to be constructed. <br /> Commissioner Brown disclosed that he met with the applicant regarding the project. He <br /> inquired whether the drive aisle down the middle of the property was going to be gated or <br /> remain open for public use. Ms. Campbell confirmed the drive aisle would be gated at both <br /> ends and would require an access code. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked for more detail on the easement and already completed roadwork. <br /> Ms. Clark explained that the area for the road on this property had been identified and secured <br /> as part of previous approvals, but staff was currently in the process of finalizing the right of way <br /> acquisitions, as part of the Nevada Street improvements. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about funding alternatives to complete the trail section. Ms. <br /> Hosterman suggested there were no current funding alternatives. She explained that the Trails <br /> Master Plan had just been completed and they had assumed it would be years before that <br /> section could be completed because, even though it was ranked as the number one priority <br /> from the community, it was expensive and complicated. She further explained the City relied <br /> heavily on private developers in that section of town for completion of the trail. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.