My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
111720
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 2:48:02 PM
Creation date
11/12/2020 2:48:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/17/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the southbound work, it became apparent that there is insuff;cient width to maintain <br /> two lanes of traffic as planned. This required the contractor to add an additional <br /> phase of construction, during which the approach slab would be constructed in three <br /> sections (similar to the northbound lanes) instead of two sections as proposed in the <br /> plans for the southbound lanes. The additional phase required additional traffic <br /> control including K-rail rental, striping, forming, and rebar, and it also created some <br /> inefficiencies, adding several workdays to the project. City staff and the contractor <br /> negotiated the cost of having six construction phases instead of five and completed <br /> Change Order No. 1 in the lump sum amount of $54,435. As previously stated, there <br /> are five change orders to date; the other four are minor and, in aggregate, reduce <br /> the contract by $1,157, making the total of the five change orders to date $53,278. <br /> 2. Additional Epoxy Crack Injection at West Las Positas at G-3 Channel and Owens <br /> Bridge at Chabot Channel (PCO No. 6) <br /> The project plans identified a total of 853 linear feet of epoxy crack injection to repair <br /> cracks in the box culverts for these two bridges. The epoxy crack injection seals <br /> cracks and prevents corrosion of the reinforcing steel. During design, the number of <br /> cracks to seal were estimated based on the visual appearance of the cracks. During <br /> construction, the crack surfaces were cleaned and routered in preparation for the <br /> injection of epoxy. This process revealed that the cracks extended much further than <br /> anticipated by visual observation. In addition, the estimate did not account for the <br /> cracks on each face of the center wall, significantly under-estimating the number of <br /> cracks requiring repair. In total, 2,213 linear feet of cracking was prepped and <br /> repaired under the epoxy crack injection line item. This work is paid for at the linear- <br /> foot unit price cost as bid by the contractor. Estimated quantities used at bid time <br /> and actual quantities measured during construction are often slightly different. At <br /> the close of the project the normal process is to issue a balaiicing change order to <br /> adjust the contract total to reflect the actual quantities measured during construction. <br /> While this project's increase in measured quantity of crack repair is larger than is <br /> normal, staff determined it best to follow the normal process and authorized the work <br /> be completed. This decision was made because returning to complete the additional <br /> crack repair work would have significantly increased the cost due to the costs <br /> associated with permitting which require the work to be completed during the dry <br /> weather before October 15, diversion of the low flow in the channel during the <br /> summer to allow the work, and the pollution containment measures required to be in <br /> place during the work in case of unexpected weather. In short, it was best to <br /> accomplish the work as part of this project compared to performing it later as <br /> another project. The balancing change order will increase the epoxy crack injection <br /> contract line item by 1,360 linear feet at $50 per linear feet, cr a total of $68,000. <br /> 3. Additional Waterline Work at Santa Rita and Arroyo Mocho (PCO #9) <br /> The project plans and record drawings showed the potable water pipeline as a <br /> ductile iron pipe extending north of the bridge in a straight line. The water pipeline <br /> was "potholed" immediately adjacent to the bridge during the design. However, <br /> during construction, as the contractor worked to excavate the pipeline to install the <br /> isolation valve required to north of the bridge, the pipeline was not found in the <br /> expected location, straight north from the pothole location. The contractor dug <br /> several holes but was unsuccessful in locating the pipeline. Eventually, with the help <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.