Laserfiche WebLink
In response to Commissioner Allen, Ms. Campbell stated the units would not allow overnight <br /> habitation. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Project Applicant Bryan Miranda gave a brief presentation on the item outlining the three <br /> changes since the last hearing. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Commissioner Allen thanked the applicant for making the Planning Commission's requested <br /> adjustments but stated she had received information regarding the project since the <br /> August 12, 2020 Work Session. She stated she was not previously aware of the General Plan <br /> policies discouraging and minimizing the use of franchise colors. She indicated staff had <br /> worked with the applicant to remove as much of the orange color from the building as they <br /> were willing, although she had since found examples of Public Storage buildings without any <br /> orange. She also mentioned she was struck by the new visuals, particularly Page 10 of the <br /> submitted plans, and the view from Stanley Boulevard toward the Irby Ranch development. <br /> She expressed concern with the visual impact of the orange, which did not fit with the General <br /> Plan intent and was not complimentary to the design of the Irby Ranch development. She <br /> requested the orange be removed except near the sales office and expressed concern about <br /> setting a precedent which would allow franchises to use bright colors. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked about the General Plan language related to corporate branding. <br /> Commissioner Allen read General Plan Policies 15, 16.1, and 16.2. Community Development <br /> Director Ellen Clark provided a description of the related items in the Pleasanton Municipal <br /> Code (PMC) Design Review criteria. In response to Commissioner Brown, Ms. Clark confirmed <br /> those requirements covered the entire City, not just the Downtown. Commissioner Brown <br /> stated he was unaware of moving away from corporate colors. He stated he was hesitant to <br /> impose greater conditions, although he acknowledged its adjacency to a residential area. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked if the Planning Commission could approve the project with <br /> additional contingent requirements on colors. Ms. Clark confirmed the Commission could <br /> determine the appropriate amount of orange. Commissioner Pace stated the applicant had <br /> done a great job applying feedback from the August 12, 2020 Work Session and the only <br /> remaining concern was color. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated he researched the U-Haul location on Stanley Boulevard, and it <br /> had a lot of orange on the building. He stated the applicant had responded to the feedback and <br /> removed the color on the north side of building. He also mentioned he thought the one-story <br /> buildings provided a good buffer from the Irby Ranch development and the one-story buildings. <br /> He stated he could support the project as presented. <br /> Chair Ritter stated the applicant had done a good job incorporating the Commission's feedback <br /> and they brought value to the location as a national brand with a good reputation. He reminded <br /> the Commission that they initially thought the Irby Ranch development was too plain. He stated <br /> he liked the trail and stated the proposal was better than previously proposed. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 October 28, 2020 <br />